<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jender]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jenderjender/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Trading housework for&nbsp;sex?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>From the AP&#8217;s article <a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080306/ap_on_re_us/sharing_chores">&#8220;Men Who do More Housework Get More Sex&#8221;</a></p>
<blockquote><p>American men still don&#8217;t pull their weight when it comes to housework and child care, but collectively they&#8217;re not the slackers they used to be. The average dad has gradually been getting better about picking himself up off the sofa and pitching in, according to a new report in which a psychologist suggests the payoff for doing more chores could be more sex.</p></blockquote>
<p>The article reports on what sounds like an all-around good trend: more equitable division of household labour and more sex.  What&#8217;s not to like?  Well, one thing not to like is the assumption that sex is a reward for men&#8211; a thing that women give to them in exchange for labour.  Has it ever occurred to the article&#8217;s author or the headline writer that sex might be, well, desired by both partners?  Or that if it&#8217;s happening and it *isn&#8217;t* desired by both partners that&#8217;s something *bad*?  (Thanks, Jender-Parents!)</p>
]]></html></oembed>