<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jender]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jenderjender/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Race in America]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/05/03/us/politics/03race.html?_r=1">This</a> is one of those New York Times trend pieces that&#8217;s wholly anecdotal and for that reason a bit dubious.  (Though unlike others, it&#8217;s not just interviews with people NY journalists are likely to bump into at parties.)  The trend it suggests is one that fits with the <a href="https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2008/10/20/obama-and-the-complexities-of-racism/">evidence on implicit bias</a>&#8212; white people being more friendly to black people now that there&#8217;s a really prominent highly admired black person who they&#8217;re seeing images of all the time.  Reading the article was both disturbing and hopeful (on the assumption that there&#8217;s a real trend here).  Disturbing (and depressing) to read of a black man being called &#8216;sir&#8217; and treated with respect on a regular basis for the first time.  Disturbing (and depressing) to read white people saying that now they feel they have something to talk about to black people so they&#8217;re now able to make conversation (WTF!?) and happy that they can do this. (Though this may be a kind of rationalisation offered when the guy in question is asked to reflect on his new-found friendliness to black people.)  But hopeful in that at least some changes may be taking place.  Maybe. (Thanks, Mr Jender!)</p>
]]></html></oembed>