<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jender]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jenderjender/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Walk the catwalk&nbsp;campaign]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.walkthecatwalk.com/">Walk the Catwalk </a>is a campaign to get the fashion industry to start using bigger sample garments.  For some time now, I&#8217;ve heard that the reason super-skinny size zero models are used is that this is the size the clothes are&#8211; which seems to presuppose that the clothes just ARE a certain size, determined by nature, which we&#8217;ve all got to live with.  Apparently things have now got to the point where established star models don&#8217;t even fit into the samples, which has motivated fashion mag editors to write to designers asking for bigger sample sizes.  But the campaign wouldn&#8217;t be very interesting if it were just &#8220;please start making clothes for Christie Brinkley again&#8221;.  Instead, it is actually asking for clothes to fit a wide range of women.  And at least some designers are doing so.  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/20/london-fashion-week-mark-fast">Mark Fast used size 12 and 14 models</a> (for US readers, that&#8217;s size 8 and 10) in his recent show.  Sadly, this caused<a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2009/sep/20/london-fashion-week-mark-fast"> some of his staff to quit</a>, though as Broadsheet <a href="http://www.salon.com/mwt/broadsheet/feature/2009/09/21/models/index.html">notes</a> the explanation may be a bit more complicated than it appears.</p>
<p>Walk the Catwalk also offers an excellent <a href="http://www.walkthecatwalk.com/change.html">list of things you can do</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>