<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[annejjacobson]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/jp12/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[This is just&nbsp;scary]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Jender <a href="https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2009/10/17/uk-academic-funding-and-impact/">blogged a few weeks back  </a>about one aspect of the redoing of higher ed the current UK government seems keen on.  And I certainly don&#8217;t want to dismiss all the current goals, such as increasing  social mobility.  But a chill goes over me when I read <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2009/nov/03/peter-mandelson-universities-modernise-plans">this</a>:</p>
<blockquote>
<h1>Mandelson to announce plans to modernise &#8216;ivory tower&#8217; universities</h1>
<p>Business secretary wants students and parents to be treated <span style="text-decoration:underline;">more like customers</span> in proposals to overhaul higher education.</p></blockquote>
<p>So what&#8217;s wrong with that?  Why can universities be more like corporations  turning out a product?  And aren&#8217;t Secretaries of Business really good judges of what the product  is? </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be really interested in hearing what you all think.  My own worry is that universities get put under a great deal of pressure to produce a product that can be recognized by the consumer, and that  tends to lead to, among other things, massive grade  inflation and all that entails, which is a sense  that money is just about enough to entitle a student to be called educated.</p>
]]></html></oembed>