<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Feminist Philosophers]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[annejjacobson]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/author/annejjacobson/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Why not?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Suppose there&#8217;s a  candidate from the party you most dislike who is running to get the nomination for president. He or she is from your state, and you think they would be a disaster for the country.  Suppose further that there&#8217;s a very subterranean rumor about this candidate that they have some feature F, which you think is at least OK, but which members of the other party certainly wouldn&#8217;t.  The rumor might be</p>
<p>They smoke pot sometimes.&#8217;</p>
<p>They are gay.</p>
<p>Both daughters have had an abortion.</p>
<p>They do not believe in God.</p>
<p>They have a hidden &#8220;love child&#8221;.</p>
<p>Closely related cousins are in Mexico or Africa.</p>
<p>And so on.</p>
<p>Now, we&#8217;re to suppose the rumor is merely a rumor, though ones that people in the legislature and so on do not deny. It&#8217;s got legs.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the question:  would you say to a conservative friend or relative in another state who is getting enthusiastic about the candidate that, you know, it is rumored that X is &#8230;. .  And fill in the blank with one of the descriptors given.</p>
<p>Why?  Or why not?</p>
<p>Just for the record:  None of this has anything to do with Rick Perry&#8217;s very recent announcement, nor was it inspired by my conservative brother&#8217;s expressed enthusiasm for him on Sunday.</p>
]]></html></oembed>