<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Fineness &amp; Accuracy]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://finenessandaccuracy.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Scott Madin]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://finenessandaccuracy.wordpress.com/author/smadin/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Another Note on Kennedy:&nbsp;Politicization]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.eschatonblog.com/2009/08/in-lieu-of-flowers-please-give-to.html">Atrios</a> and <a href="http://pandagon.net/index.php/site/comments/please_politicize_my_death/">Amanda Marcotte</a> have this exactly right, of course.  And more generally, as <a href="http://nomoremister.blogspot.com/2009/08/friends-romans-countrymen.html">Aimai notes</a>, using a major figure&#8217;s death to try to galvanize support for the causes that person believed in is a <em>perfectly normal, reasonable thing to do</em>, and it would really be nice if we&#8217;d all stop pretending that there&#8217;s something <em>wrong</em> with saying: Ted Kennedy is no longer with us, but let us honor his memory by fighting <em>harder</em>, by doubling our efforts, to achieve those goals to which he dedicated his life.  Health care for all.  A living wage for all.  Equality under the law.  The principle that <em>human</em> rights do not end where citizenship does.  A better world.</p>
<p>After all, on the one hand Kennedy was a master politician.  He loved politics, he lived and breathed politics, he believed — as I believe — that politics is not only a necessary, inherent part of human life but has the potential to be used for great good.  To suggest that we would do him best honor by <em>refraining</em> from politics seems odd, at best.  And on the other hand, it&#8217;s not as though conservatives are going to scrupulously avoid &#8220;politicizing&#8221; his death, though they&#8217;ll mainly do it under cover of pretending to decry <em>liberal</em> &#8220;politicization.&#8221;  Indeed, <a href="http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/old-as-time-by-digby-as-we-gird.html">digby points out</a> that Limbaugh is already doing this.</p>
<p>Actually, Limbaugh is a little bit right, here, though I&#8217;m pretty sure it&#8217;s by accident.  Attaching Kennedy&#8217;s name to the bill most likely to pass — some watered-down compromise with no public option and a lot of giveaways to insurance companies — <em>would</em> be an insult to his memory.  Senator Kennedy <em>was</em> a pragmatic incrementalist, <a href="https://finenessandaccuracy.wordpress.com/2009/02/27/why-i-am-not-a-revolutionary/">as also am I</a>, but he always fought to get as much as he thought he could each time.  Incrementalism ceases to be pragmatic if you seek only the tiniest improvement <em>even when</em> a greater leap is feasible, and health care, now, is surely such a case.  <a href="http://www.eschatonblog.com/2009/08/left-of-left.html">Nearly four in five Americans supports a public option.</a> To fail to take advantage of <em>that</em> opportunity, and especially to embrace such failure as a fitting tribute to Senator Kennedy&#8217;s legacy, would truly be an insult.</p>
]]></html></oembed>