<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[shattersnipe: malcontent &amp; rainbows]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[fozmeadows]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/author/fozmeadows/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The Next Generation]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>For anyone interested in generational change and culture, I reccomend <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/news/parenting/children-of-the-tech-revolution/2008/07/15/1215887601694.html?page=fullpage#contentSwap2">this fascinating article</a> on <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Z">Generation Z</a>. While I disagree with making broad generalisations about generational personality types, there&#8217;s something wonderful (and a little awe-making) about the prospect of seeing how these genuine digital natives grow up. It&#8217;s not just the presence of computers in school, but the omnipresent fluency with which they&#8217;re used, and from what age &#8211; totally different to my own experience, when the new technology was still novel and effectively tacked on, curriculum-wise, to the old standards. The idea of environmental awareness at a young age is similarly exciting, and an interesting social experiement in its own right: despite our love of self-analysis, has anyone ever sat down and marvelled at the fact that one generation of human beings can instill an ethical structure in their successors that they themselves don&#8217;t share to the same degree? That we are, in this sense, able to successfully transmit a do-as-I-say, not-as-I-do policy? How remarkable is that?</p>
<p>Reading the article, my other thought was on meta-analysis. In wondering how Gen Z will evolve, the writer considered a wealth of factors &#8211; the economy, environment, politics, materialism, parenting, schools, technology and so on &#8211; but <em>not</em> the impact of public generational commentary. By which I mean: now more than at any other time, there is a wealth of visible media speculation on the nature of Gen Z compared to their predecessors, how they&#8217;ll turn out, what they&#8217;ll achieve, and given the very fact that Gen Z is so well-informed and socially literate, it seems impossible that they not notice this, and react. In this sense, the experiment of vocal social analysis is <em>not</em> a double blind: there is nothing to separate the speculation of the observers from influencing the behaviour of their subjects. And given how much hope is currently being invested in Gen Z &#8211; can they stop global warming? reduce carbon emissions? build a sustainable future? &#8211; I&#8217;ve got to wonder: will these visible expectations ultimately prove positive, or detrimental?</p>
]]></html></oembed>