<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[shattersnipe: malcontent &amp; rainbows]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[fozmeadows]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/author/fozmeadows/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Better Red Than&#8230;?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m thoroughly fed up with the deluge of patriotic, nationalistic advertising during the Olympics coverage. Top offenders include Telstra, with their motifs of manufacturedly-diverse Australians clustered around mobile phones to watch the Games; Qantas, with their children&#8217;s choir singing in the shape of a kangaroo about which island continent they call home; and Panasonic, who have shamelessly co-opted almost the entire swim team in order to sell more cameras. The Commonwealth Bank also rates a mention, not so much due to patriotism, but because their bizarre series of forcedly-post-modern, let&#8217;s-mock-American-marketeers-while-simultaneously-selling-home-loans commercials are currently broadcast on Channel 7 at the rate of approximately ten to the half hour.</p>
<p>When it comes to bafflement, however, Red Rooster takes the cake. Their most recent campaign slogan, &#8216;it&#8217;s gotta be red&#8217;, has been frotting around the airwaves for most of 2008, but has been quixotically altered in honour of the Olympics.  &#8216;Notice how well red goes with China?&#8217; their ads ask &#8211; and for the life of me, I cannot tell whether irony is intended, or if the fact that <em>red</em> is traditionally synonymous with <em>communism </em>has managed to completely escape the marketing gurus of a giant American &#8211; that is to say, <em>capitalist</em> &#8211; corporation. Surely, a part of me thinks, this can&#8217;t be the case. Someone, somewhere must have pointed out that China&#8217;s flag is red for a <em>reason</em>. But if that be so, then the irony is unintended, and therefore equally perturbing in its implications: that a capitalist company has, on the one hand, publicly commented on how well communism suits China; and on the other, is now using this fact to sell chicken.</p>
<p>Truly, the mind boggles.</p>
]]></html></oembed>