<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[shattersnipe: malcontent &amp; rainbows]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[fozmeadows]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/author/fozmeadows/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Wherein Satire Is Made&nbsp;Redundant]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Cruising through the <a href="www.nytimes.com">New York Times</a> today, I did a double-take on the following headline:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/20/us/20internet.html?_r=1&amp;em">Teenagers&#8217; Internet Socializing Not a Bad Thing</a></p>
<p>As this is a blatantly obvious observation akin to announcing that Chocolate Is Bad For You But People Eat It Anyway, I spent a good minute staring at the link, trying to figure out what I was missing. My instinctive reaction was that, for reasons unknown, the Times and <a href="www.theonion.com">the Onion</a> had somehow contrived to swap stories. Or maybe those <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2008/nov/12/1">fake headline guys</a> had struck again &#8211; who knows? Unable to come up with a better theory, I decided to read on.</p>
<p>Frighteningly, it appears the story is genuine. How anyone could remain oblivious as to why teenagers &#8211; or, for that matter, adults &#8211; use <a href="www.myspace.com">MySpace</a> and <a href="www.facebook.com">Facebook</a> is beyond me, while the idea that the MacArthur Foundation actually put money towards proving the bleeding obvious causes a small but vital part of my cerubellum to bulge in a worrying fashion. Seriously, dudes? Young folk nowadays use of the Internets. They send of the text messags, speak on the cellular phones and jive to the rock&#8217;n&#8217; roll musics. Deal with it. (I have a sneaking suspicion that the author, Tamar Lewin, is a modern-day Luddite. Only someone completely out of touch with reality could put quotation marks around the phrase &#8220;geeking out&#8221; and hope to be taken seriously about either technology or youth culture.)</p>
<p>In other unintentionally-self-mocking news, Germaine Greer, that grumpy old feminist, has <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/world/greer-ridicules-that-dress-20081120-6bpe.html">lambasted Michelle Obama&#8217;s election-victory dress</a> with the kind of angry, colourful prose normally reserved for botched military campaigns. The irony of a feminist icon slagging a powerful, intelligent, prominent woman purely on the basis of her clothes &#8211; and, stranger still, complaining that Malia and Sasha&#8217;s dresses weren&#8217;t &#8220;girly&#8221; &#8211; is disturbingly potent. Especially now that <a href="http://www.theage.com.au/national/dressing-down-for-sloppy-greer-20081120-6cu8.html">actual fashion designers have called Greer&#8217;s own wardrobe into question</a> (lordy!), the whole ludicrous incident is eerily reminiscent of something the <a href="http://img2.timeinc.net/ew/dynamic/imgs/050321/151820__mrs_l.jpg">Monty Python pepperpots</a> might have done.</p>
<p>Now there&#8217;s a thought &#8211; try <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Germaine_Greer.jpg">a photo of Germaine Greer </a>next to <a href="http://www.quizilla.com/user_images/E/emmysquizies/1036843717__pepperpot.jpg">Terry Jones in drag</a> and see what you think. To quote the quintessential Python/Pepperpots exchange:</p>
<p>&#8220;Shh. It&#8217;s satire!&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;No it isn&#8217;t &#8211; this is zany madcap humour!&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/twofaced-kitten-born-in-perth--a-hrefhttpwwwsmhcomauphotogallery200703071173166769017html-bphotosb/2008/11/20/1226770635862.html">two-faced kitten</a>.</p>
<p>Fourth wall, anyone?</p>
]]></html></oembed>