<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[shattersnipe: malcontent &amp; rainbows]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[fozmeadows]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/author/fozmeadows/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Kurt Schlichter Is A Sexist&nbsp;Ass]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>A month ago, columnist Joel Stein decided it would be a good idea to <a href="https://fozmeadows.wordpress.com/2012/03/30/joel-stein-is-a-sexist-ass/">formally declare himself as a sexist ass</a> by <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2012/03/28/the-power-of-young-adult-fiction/adults-should-read-adult-books">decrying grown men with a penchant for female-oriented YA novels</a>. Now, however, another columnist has evidently decided to follow in his misguided, asshat footsteps &#8211; one <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Hollywood/2012/04/25/my-little-pony">Kurt Schlichter, who has let forth a veritable tirade against men who like <em>My Little Pony</em></a>.</p>
<p>As with Stein&#8217;s piece, Schlichter never actually states outright that girls and girlish things are inherently inferior to men and masculinity, though he comes perilously close: in his eyes, bronies &#8211; male MLP fans &#8211; are distinguished from &#8216;real men&#8217; as being:</p>
<blockquote><p>pathetic sissies [who] giggle like schoolgirls&#8230; harmless fem-boys who stopped maturing at age seven&#8230; perma-virgins&#8230; acting like idiots&#8230; losers&#8230; man-children&#8230; geebos.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or, in other words: MEN WHO LIKE GIRL THINGS ARE ICKY AND THEY FREAK ME OUT.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a coincidence that Schlichter describes the brony trend as &#8216;terrifying&#8217;. For him, as with Stein, the idea of men and boys enjoying something that&#8217;s meant for girls is a sign of their unmanliness and, as a consequence, unworth. The fact that he compares bronies to the &#8216;real men &#8211; and women&#8230; tromping through the wilds of Afghanistan&#8217; is so ludicrous it reads like satire: just think, citizens &#8211; while our soldiers suffer and die for your freedom, some selfish dilettantes are repaying those efforts by <em>actually using it! </em></p>
<p>The fact that Schlichter makes no mention of women who watch the show is telling. Presumably, he thinks, it&#8217;s fine for mothers to bond with their daughters over it, or at the least, women at home with their children have a better excuse for exposure. And as for us childless female viewers &#8211; well, we&#8217;re still ladies, after all! It might be an equal waste of our time, but at least it&#8217;s a <em>gender-appropriate</em> waste. The idea of fathers watching to bond with their children, or men simply wanting to enjoy a fun, uncomplicated show, is clearly anathema to him. The objection isn&#8217;t to adults watching cartoons, though Schlichter&#8217;s language occasionally tries to pretend as much &#8211; it&#8217;s to <em>men</em> watching <em>girl</em> cartoons.</p>
<p>Indeed, as Schlichter so condescendingly points out:</p>
<blockquote><p>Fandom, even potentially nerdy fandom, need not be destructive. For example, the original “Star Trek” had real merit. The character of Captain Kirk provided an example of true manhood – note that the attributes commonly associated with ‘manhood’ are not limited by mere gender, as heroes like <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leigh_Ann_Hester" target="_blank">Sergeant Leigh Ann Hester</a> proved – even within the concept of science fiction. Watching James T. Kirk teaches young males key life lessons – that violence is an important option for defeating evil, that individual dignity is worth fighting for, and that scoring with green alien chicks is awesome.</p></blockquote>
<p>Translation: geeky shit is fine for guys, so long as the female characters are either acting like masculine heroes or being seduced by them. (<em>Lord of the Rings</em> is apparently fine by Schlichter, too, because the presence of martial themes trumps the presence of elves. I&#8217;m betting the comparative absence of women doesn&#8217;t hurt either.)</p>
<p>Dear Kurt: you know why so many people are happy to undercut what you call &#8216;traditional morality, conservatism and&#8230; positive values?&#8217; Because they&#8217;re sexist, anachronistic, arbitrary and awful! Rigidly enforced definitions of masculinity and femininity are hurtful to everyone, and though you obviously disagree, your obvious disdain for girl things &#8211; and, by extension, girls &#8211; is as sexist as it comes.</p>
<p>And to all the bronies out there: keep up the good work, and don&#8217;t let the asshats get you down!</p>
]]></html></oembed>