<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[GameUP24]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://gameup24.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[William A.]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://gameup24.wordpress.com/author/louzwate/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Random: Here&#8217;s a Theory on the Rather Short NES Mini Controller&nbsp;Cables]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><img title="Random: Here's a Theory on the Rather Short NES Mini Controller Cables - Nintendo Life" src="http://ift.tt/2ftyVB6"></p>
<div>
<section>
<aside>
</aside>
<p>We suspect that many that own a Nintendo Entertainment System: NES Classic Edition (Nintendo Classic Mini: Nintendo Entertainment System in Europe) will have fallen in love with it, but it has some flaws. One of these is the incredibly short controller cable; putting aside the retro &#8216;realism&#8217; of wired controllers in this day and age (a weird argument for a tiny box running ROMs), the cables on the accompanying controllers are about as short as is feasible. Ultimately you&#8217;ll need to be sitting very close to the little system to play it.</p>
<p>A post on <a href="http://ift.tt/2gmofbK">Reddit</a> has tried to break down why the cable is so short, and has focused on the controller being &#8211; in essence &#8211; a Classic Controller that can be plugged into Wii Remotes, as seen by the port it uses. The post by &#8217;emuboy85&#8242; focuses on the cable and technology in the Nunchuk, primarily how it communicates signals such as button presses and control inputs. It&#8217;s the &#8216;communication protocol&#8217; used, the theory goes, that means cables for the Nunchuk and Classic Controllers need to be short (especially when keeping costs low).</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The communication protocol used is I2C , this protocol was designed in 1982 by Phillips (now NXP) and was designed for &quot;high speed&quot; chip to chip communication, it does have some limit for the actual standards , first is the speed, second is the length, according to <a href="http://ift.tt/1jySDsE">this</a> the length of the NES mini/Nunchuck is right 50pF , which is the maximum you can get from a yet-flexible cable.</p>
<p>So, why they didn&#8217;t make a thicker cable? Because would have been more expensive and less practical.</p>
<p>And what about the extension cables? The probably works but are pushing the limit of the protocol, you probably get some communication errors but you don&#8217;t notice them while you are playing.</p>
<p>Why Nintendo didn&#8217;t use another communication protocol? Because otherwise they would had to make a new set of controllers just for the mini, not compatible with the wii and wii u which is an expensive procedure, design and manufacture the connector itself is really expensive and the NES mini is a small product for Nintendo.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>It seems feasible, though the NES Mini controller <em>could</em> have had a longer cable. We compared our NES Mini pad with a Nunchuk and a Super NES Classic Controller (an old Club Nintendo reward) &#8211; both the older controllers have a slightly longer cable. So even if this theory is 100% correct, which it may be, the NES Mini controller could have still had a little more length in the cable.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an interesting theory, in any case. Let us know what you think in the comments.</p>
<p><em>With thanks to Benson for the heads up</em>.</p>
</section>
</div>
<p><em>Source: <a style="text-decoration:none;" href="http://ift.tt/2fWOLYJ">Nintendo Life</a></em></p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[http://ift.tt/2ftyVB6]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>