<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Gawker Sucks]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://gawkersucks.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[tshirts]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://gawkersucks.wordpress.com/author/tshirts/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Gawker Media properties inserted in copyrighted&nbsp;material]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p> Gawker Media gets traffic with copyrighted material?</p>
<p>I find this bit even more interesting, <a href="http://news.com.com/2100-1025_3-6155627.html?part=rss&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-5&amp;subj=news"><font color="#330000">a YouTube user named &#8216;belowtheradar&#8217; is posting others&#8217; copyrighted material</font></a> &#8212; but with brand advertising for Gawker Media properties inserted. For example, a <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qmSpI_BNiCg"><font color="#330000">clip about the Lite-Brite-challenged city of Boston</font></a> recorded from a local NBC affiliate has a pre-roll ad for Gizmodo, one of Gawker Media&#8217;s blogs. The race is on to figure out who belowtheradar is and what connection that person has to Gawker, if any. [<a href="http://www.mediabattoir.net/2007/02/viacom_gawker_headaches_for_youtube.html">mediabattoir</a>]</p>
]]></html></oembed>