<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Glenn Chan&#039;s Random Notes on Investing]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://glennchan.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[GlennC]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://glennchan.wordpress.com/author/glennchan/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Most investment returns are&nbsp;bull****]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>More often than not, you&#8217;ll hear about people beating the market or otherwise doing really well.  But a lot of them are misleading and/or overstated.  Here&#8217;s why.</p>
<p><strong>People are more likely to report great returns than crappy ones</strong></p>
<p>Most people have egos and/or want themselves to look good.  If their investment returns suck, then they are highly likely to keep their mouth shut because they don&#8217;t want to look dumb.</p>
<p>Sometimes, it&#8217;s in the speaker&#8217;s self-interest to promote themselves or their companies.  And it&#8217;s almost always that case that behaviour follows incentives.</p>
<p>Here are some ways to overstate returns.</p>
<p><strong>Cherry picking</strong></p>
<p>Suppose you flip a coin 10 times and it lands heads 5 times and tails 5 times.  The first two flips are tails.  So, you start counting from the third flip.  Lo and behold, your coin flipping record is 5 heads and 3 tails.  It gives the impression that you&#8217;re good at flipping heads.  But the actual track record (5-5) is simply average.</p>
<p>Mutual funds do this by reporting the 3-month, 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, since inception, etc. return&#8230; whichever happens to be better.  If a mutual fund really stinks it up, it will usually end up being merged or shut down.  Which leads us to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Survivorship bias</strong></p>
<p>If all the poor/unlucky performing mutual funds are taken out, then the survivors will be stacked towards having good track records.  So you end up with a world where it looks like most mutual funds are able to &#8220;beat&#8221; the market.  But this might not be the case.  (The reality is that most mutual funds charge way too much in fees.  On average, they will lag the market a lot because of these fees.)</p>
<p><strong>Not actual returns</strong></p>
<p>Sometimes people report returns based on backtesting historical data.  It&#8217;s not based on actual returns.  The problem with backtesting is that it often suffers from <em>data mining</em>.  If you look at enough data, you will find correlations that won&#8217;t predict the future.  For example, if you categorize stocks based on the first letter of their name, you will find that some letter will outperform all others.  However, a company&#8217;s name will have little to do with how well that company will perform in the future.</p>
<p><strong>Simply lie about it</strong></p>
<p>Some people like Bernie Madoff just make stuff up.  Is this really news?</p>
<p><strong>My investment returns 😉</strong></p>
<p>2008-2009 combined  +22.1%</p>
<p>2010  +25.8%</p>
<p>Yes, my penis is bigger than yours*.</p>
<p>(*Just kidding.  It probably isn&#8217;t.)</p>
]]></html></oembed>