<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Glenn Chan&#039;s Random Notes on Investing]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://glennchan.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[GlennC]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://glennchan.wordpress.com/author/glennchan/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Closed my CHK put option&nbsp;position]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what I think about Chesapeake&#8230;</p>
<p><!--more--></p>
<ol>
<li>As <a title="Chesapeake (CHK): Is this really a long?" href="https://glennchan.wordpress.com/2013/10/21/chesapeake-chk-is-this-really-a-long/">explained previously</a>, their accounting and reserve estimation are very aggressive and more aggressive than most of its peers.</li>
<li>Aubrey McClendon, the former CEO, was very good at selling and financial engineering.  The royalty trust and <a title="Chesapeake’s one-sided midstream deals" href="https://glennchan.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/chesapeakes-one-sided-midstream-deals/">the midstream deal</a> were very good deals for Chesapeake.  There is some hidden value in Chesapeake&#8217;s drilling carries (though this may be factored into Chesapeake&#8217;s PV-10 values already).  The Volumetric Production Payments and the preferred share deals are kind of smart because they transfer collateral away from Chesapeake&#8217;s bondholders.  This lowers the interest rate on the VPP and preferred shares (though Chesapeake will need to pay higher interest on any future bond issues).</li>
<li>I was hoping that McClendon was using financial engineering to inflate Chesapeake&#8217;s books.  Largely I don&#8217;t think that he did so.  (If he did that, I&#8217;d probably be buying more puts.)</li>
<li>The new CEO, Doug Lawler, is weird.  He legitimately cut a lot of corporate excess.  He is getting Chesapeake out of the real estate development business.  Most people would tell investors about what they have done but Lawler has not.  It&#8217;s like he wants to live in a fantasy land where he doesn&#8217;t want to admit that Chesapeake has problems like any other business???  I don&#8217;t get it.</li>
</ol>
<p>Overall, I am still a little bearish on Chesapeake.  I may have closed my position too early.  But I don&#8217;t think that it&#8217;s a mistake to take profits given that Chesapeake is not completely awful.  It is not the worst E&amp;P out there (look at the ones with higher short interest than CHK).</p>
<p><em>*Disclosure:  No position in CHK.</em></p>
]]></html></oembed>