<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The Tactical Hermit]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://hcsblogdotorg.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[The Tactical Hermit]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://hcsblogdotorg.wordpress.com/author/thetacticalhermit/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[What the 2016 Presidential Candidates Get Wrong About the Future of&nbsp;War]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><img data-attachment-id="12846" data-permalink="https://hcsblogdotorg.wordpress.com/2016/03/08/what-the-2016-presidential-candidates-get-wrong-about-the-future-of-war/defense-large-5/" data-orig-file="https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg" data-orig-size="710,325" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;orientation&quot;:&quot;0&quot;}" data-image-title="defense-large" data-image-description="" data-medium-file="https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg?w=300" data-large-file="https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg?w=710" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-12846" src="https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg?w=1024&#038;h=469" alt="defense-large" srcset="https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg 710w, https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg?w=150&amp;h=69 150w, https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg?w=300&amp;h=137 300w" sizes="(max-width: 710px) 100vw, 710px"   /></p>
<p>They fail, they lack, they misunderstand, they pander, they don’t get, and they just don’t know national security – not according to our Future of War roster of experts.</p>
<p><strong>“The President shall be Commander in Chief…”</strong></p>
<aside class="d1-inline-subscribe-container newsletter">
<h3 class="d1-inline-subscribe-title"></h3>
</aside>
<aside class="d1-author-bio-container">
<p class="d1-author-bio-text">This clause that leads Article Two, Section <span class="caps">II</span> of the <span class="caps">U.S.</span> Constitution is without a doubt the most important of the executive powers granted to the president by the Founding Fathers. But as today’s crop of presidential candidates seek that job, do they really understand the issues that await them tomorrow when it comes to the future of war?</p>
</aside>
<p>If history is any guide, the answer is no. When George Washington took the oath of office for the first time, he didn’t expect he’d soon be leading a force of some 13,000 troops into Western Pennsylvania to put down the Whiskey Rebellion (the first and last time the president served as a commander in chief in the field). Abraham Lincoln, at his inauguration, expected conflict was on the way, as seven Southern states already had seceded since his election. But no one expected the Civil War would last four more years and introduce industrialized warfare. More recently, George W. Bush entered office lamenting “nation building” and would leave it presiding over two massive nation-building efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan. In turn, Barack Obama pledged to responsibly end America’s involvements in these wars. He will leave office not only with forces still there, but also having commanded air and drone war campaigns in Syria, Libya, Yemen, Pakistan, and Somalia.</p>
<p>The Future of War project is a joint effort of New America and Arizona State, in partnership with <em>Defense One</em>, that brings together a diverse group of experts, whose backgrounds range from Navy SEALs and scientists to historians, journalists, and lawyers. As a lead up to the project’s <a href="http://futureofwar.newamerica.org/">“Future of War” conference</a> on Mar. 10—which you can livestream <a href="http://www.defenseone.com/technology/2016/03/livestream-future-war-conference-2016/126406/">here</a>—we asked them:</p>
<p><strong>“</strong><strong>What do the 2016 presidential candidates get most wrong about the #FutureofWar?”</strong></p>
<p>Their answers covered areas that ranged from strategy to terrorism, but a theme that cut through was the need to be honest to the American people, and themselves, about what awaits. In an age of <span class="caps">TV</span> soundbites and Twitter trolling, let’s hope that whoever wins the upcoming election is the exception to the rule that presidential candidates just don’t get the Future of War.</p>
<p>Read the Remainder at<strong> <a href="http://www.defenseone.com/ideas/2016/03/what-2016-presidential-candidates-get-wrong-about-future-war/126478/?oref=defenseone_today_nl">Defense One</a></strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://hcsblogdotorg.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/defense-large.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[439]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[201]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>