If Muhammad cannot beat the infidels on the battlefield, he’ll outbreed them—literally: “Mohammed most popular name for newborn boys in the Netherlands for second year in a row,” is the title of a recent report.  Muhammadis apparently also the most popular name in England. In fact, Muhammad is one of the most popular names throughout Northwest Europe.

While this may seem innocuous enough—what’s in a name?—the fact is many Muslims see their offspring as their contribution to the jihad—literally, the “struggle” to make Islam supreme—since more numbers equate more influence and power.   Nor is the naming of “Muhammad” a coincidence but rather a cryptic reminder from the parents (usually father) of whom they most revere and hope their sons emulate—namely, the founder of Islam/jihad.

Although the original, historic jihad was straightforward warfare on the infidel to make Islam supreme, the ulemaarticulated a variety of other jihads, all of which work to the same end: as with jihad al-lisan (literally tongue, meaning propaganda, apologias, polemics, etc.), jihad al-mal (monetarily or materially supporting jihadis, including through zakat), jihad al-wilada (or childbearing) is seen as a way to contribute to the “struggle” to make Islam supreme.

This can be achieved with either infidel or Muslim women.  As an example of the first, a Muslim imam was videotaped saying that, because European men lack virility, their women seek fertility among Muslim men.  Accordingly, “We will give them fertility! We will breed children with them, because we will conquer their countries!  Whether you like it or not, you Germans, Americans, French, and Italians and all those akin to you [Western people]—take in the refugees.  For soon we will call them [and their European born sons] in the name of the coming caliphate!  And we will say to you, ‘These are our sons.’”

Read the Remainder at FrontPage Mag