<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Chateau Heartiste]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://heartiste.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[CH]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://heartiste.wordpress.com/author/roissy/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Different Standards Vs Double&nbsp;Standards]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Hypocrisy is the tribute vice pays to virtue, but what if the hypocrisy isn&#8217;t a tribute but a misinterpretation of a separate rule book?</p>
<p>chris comments,</p>
<blockquote><p>It is not hypocritical to treat different things differently. It is hypocritical to treat same things differently.</p>
<p>Are men and women the same? Are the fitness costs for promiscuity the same for men and women?</p></blockquote>
<p>Short and sweet. Parents are more vigilant about Daughter Guarding than they are about Son Guarding because daughter&#8217;s eggs are far more precious than son&#8217;s sperms, and there&#8217;s the fact that if daughter gets knocked up she&#8217;s bringing the baby home to family. So slut shaming women while rake praising men isn&#8217;t hypocrisy, but the expression of naturally formed sociopsychological rules to navigate two separate and distinct playing fields. It&#8217;s different standards for different things.</p>
<p>Real hypocrisy would be what we see virtue sniveling shitlibs offer up as alms to their Equalism God: they speak of the blessings of nonWhite Diversity™ as they retreat to homogeneous gated communities and gentrified urban cloisters. Here the rulebook governing what they preach and what they practice is the same; it&#8217;s different standards for the same thing.</p>
]]></html></oembed>