<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Chateau Heartiste]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://heartiste.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[CH]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://heartiste.wordpress.com/author/roissy/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Diversity + Proximity = Hostile Work&nbsp;Environment]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>If I haven&#8217;t already, <a href="https://ceo.usc.edu/files/2016/09/1996-16-t96_16-Teams.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">this 1996 study</a> deserves to be added to the Diversity + Proximity = War reference list at the top of this blog&#8217;s home page. Executive summary: Demographically (i.e., racially and ethnically) diverse workplaces have lower cohesion, lower satisfaction, and higher turnover.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;high diversity prevents social integration and cohesion from forming on the team. In their absence, team members are unable to effectively process information&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;Group cohesiveness is positively related to performance. Three meta-analyses and several empirical studies found a slight to moderate positive relationship between cohesiveness and performance. This is a robust finding in an area that has long been studied&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;separated conflict into two types: relationship conflict (interpersonal incompatibilities, tension, animosity, and annoyance) and task conflict (disagreement among group members about task content)&#8230;Relationship conflict was detrimental to satisfaction and to members’ intent to remain in the group regardless of the type of task&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;The most consistent findings occurred when tenure predicted strategic persistence and change, and when demographic heterogeneity predicted turnover&#8230;.there’s a direct relationship between diversity and turnover, in that similarities attract and those dissimilar may be 40 pressured to leave the team&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>Diversity is not our organizational strength. At best, diversity is our neutral organizational variable; at worst, diversity is our disorder.</p>
<p>So why do our overlords foist it on us?</p>
<p>Because our cooperative homogeneity is our strength&#8230;and their vulnerability.</p>
<p>***</p>
<p>Commenter westray exposes the fundamental contradiction at the heart of modren anti-White leftism:</p>
<blockquote><p>“Diversity Is Our Strength” right next to “All Races Are Equal” placards at any given lefty rally. And no lefty can see the self-cancellation. You could walk a 3 year old boy through that and he’d have a more clear understanding.</p>
<p>“These people are different, right?”</p>
<p>“Yes.”</p>
<p>“So are they the same if they are different?”</p>
<p>“No”</p>
<p>“If they are different will they do things the same way?”</p>
<p>“No”</p>
<p>“If they are different will they do things differently?”</p>
<p>“Yes”</p>
<p>“If people do things differently will there be different results?”</p>
<p>“Yes”</p>
<p>Sorted.</p></blockquote>
<p>If Orwell were alive today, would he have spent the last years of his life saying &#8220;I told you so&#8221; over and over to whomever was listening?</p>
]]></html></oembed>