<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[History Tech]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://historytech.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[glennw]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://historytech.wordpress.com/author/glennw98/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[NCHE Day Two &#8211; Common Core and historical&nbsp;thinking]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Bruce Lesh, of <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Why-Wont-Just-Tell-Answer/dp/1571108122" target="_blank">Why Won&#8217;t You Just Tell Us the Answer</a> fame, shared a bit this afternoon on how his class does history and how those practices align with the Common Core.</p>
<p><strong>Reading standards</strong></p>
<p>The Common Core asks our students to read critically, examine documents, ask questions of those documents, use a variety of documents, and to develop literacy skills that let them read effectively</p>
<p>Bruce suggests that most good history teachers have been doing this sort of &#8220;common core&#8221; stuff forever. We ask kids to look at:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>the text</strong><br />
What is visible? What info is provided by the source?</li>
<li><strong>the context</strong><br />
What else was going on during this period? How does this help explain the document?</li>
<li><strong>the subtext</strong><br />
What is happening between the lines? Who&#8217;s author / Audience / Purpose?</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://historytech.wordpress.com/2010/03/02/sam-wineburg-is-still-a-stud/" target="_blank">Sam Wineburg</a> suggests the same thing when he describes:<strong><br />
</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Sourcing</strong>: Think about a document’s author and its creation.</li>
<li><strong>Contextualizing</strong>: Situate the document and its events in time and place</li>
<li><strong>Close reading</strong>: Carefully consider what the document says and the language used to say it.</li>
<li><strong>Using Background Knowledge</strong>: Use historical information and knowledge to read and understand the document.</li>
<li><strong>Reading the Silences</strong>: Identify what has been left out or is missing from the document by asking questions of its account.</li>
<li><strong>Corroborating</strong>: Ask questions about important details across multiple sources to determine points of agreement and disagreement.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Writing standards</strong></p>
<p>The Common Core asks our students to write arguments on discipline specific texts, support opinions with evidence, apple domain specific vocabulary, compose arguments / opinions, and to create informational and narrative text.</p>
<p><strong>The things that drive Bruce</strong></p>
<p>The idea that:</p>
<ul>
<li>Historians ask questions that frame a problem for them to solve</li>
<li>Historians gather and asks questions of a variety of sources</li>
<li>History Lab activities</li>
</ul>
<p>A History Lab has four basic components:</p>
<ul>
<li>A great central question</li>
<li>Evaluation of sources with any information gained applied to development of an answer to the question</li>
<li>Employment of literacy skills to evaluate sources</li>
<li>The development / refinement / defense of an evidence-based answer to the central question</li>
</ul>
<p>Bruce used a sample lesson focused on the 1970 invasion of Cambodia. His central question? Is Nixon trying to widen the war or to achieve Peace with Honor?</p>
<p><a href="https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg"><img loading="lazy" data-attachment-id="11843" data-permalink="https://historytech.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/nche-day-two-common-core-and-historical-thinking/nixon-20000-dead-3/" data-orig-file="https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg" data-orig-size="205,263" data-comments-opened="1" data-image-meta="{&quot;aperture&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;credit&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;camera&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;caption&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;created_timestamp&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;copyright&quot;:&quot;&quot;,&quot;focal_length&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;iso&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;shutter_speed&quot;:&quot;0&quot;,&quot;title&quot;:&quot;&quot;}" data-image-title="Nixon 20000 dead" data-image-description="" data-image-caption="" data-medium-file="https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg?w=205" data-large-file="https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg?w=205" class="alignright  wp-image-11843" style="margin:5px;" title="Nixon 20000 dead" src="https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg?w=205&#038;h=263" alt="" width="205" height="263" srcset="https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg 205w, https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg?w=117&amp;h=150 117w" sizes="(max-width: 205px) 100vw, 205px" /></a>He started with the Crosby, Stills, Nash, and Young song <a href="http://thrasherswheat.org/fot/ohio.htm" target="_blank"><em>Four Dead in Ohio</em></a>. We also looked at some basic Kent State and Hard Hat riot information, Nixon&#8217;s speech announcing his plan to invade Cambodia, a few political cartoons, a poster demanding a protest march on the White House, transcripts from Oval Office conversations between Nixon and Kissinger, and a 1968 Nixon campaign ad.</p>
<p>A nice exercise that looked at a wide variety of sources with a good question for students to address. We also talked about different ways for students to create their own secondary source that addressed the question.</p>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://historytech.files.wordpress.com/2012/03/nixon-20000-dead2.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>