<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[The unadulterated views of James Courtenay                  Deputy Leader of Southend Council]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://jamescourtenay.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[jamescourtenay]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://jamescourtenay.wordpress.com/author/jamescourtenay/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Woodley Maths &#8211; now it&#8217;s costing YOU&nbsp;money!]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Last night was the first opportunity I had to question Cllr Ron Woodley on his claim that he was reducing borrowing by £38m, thereby saving £2m a year in outgoings. I pointed out to him, that his draft budget papers showed an INCREASE in borrowing, over and above what the previous budget (and Administration) had proposed, of some £5.8m next year (15/16) and £9.6m over the next four years or so (15/16 &#8211; 18/19 &#8216;and later years&#8217;).</p>
<p>I do not mean to labour the point, but this is EXTRA borrowing, over and above what the previous Administration had proposed:</p>
<p>In the February 2014 budget papers the previous Administration proposed borrowings of:</p>
<p>2015/16 &#8211; £9.3m<br />
2016/17 &#8211; £15.9m<br />
2017/18 &#8211; £13m<br />
<strong>A total of £38.2m</strong></p>
<p>The current Administrations proposals include proposed borrowings of:</p>
<p>2015/16 &#8211; £24.3m<br />
2016/17 &#8211; £16.1m<br />
2017/18 &#8211; £15.5m<br />
<strong>A total of £55.9m</strong></p>
<p>This is some £17.7m MORE than the previous Administration proposed.</p>
<p>Things are never quite as simple as they look, and the Council can borrow from itself (spending short term surplus cash it has) &#8211; and who wouldn&#8217;t&#8230; but at the end of the day the Council will need that money and therefore have to borrow it. But, even making allowances for this (£10.3m ‘internal borrowing’), the proposed borrowing is going up by over £7m. For the eagle eyed of you, the reason for the difference to the £9.6m is, I believe, mainly because of the underspend in the 2014/15 budget.</p>
<p>Now, I, like the previous Leader of the Council, had no objection to borrowing &#8211; it just isn&#8217;t sensible for the Council to fund something the town will get a return from over the next 25 years in one year&#8217;s budget. But neither he nor I stood in the Council Chamber or distributed leaflets suggesting borrowing was too high, out of control, and that he wouldn&#8217;t borrow any more. There was even the suggestion of saving up for projects before starting them. Well that idea seems to have disappeared rather quickly!</p>
<p>Anyway, last night I asked him to explain how the paperwork that shows increased borrowings of £9.6m equates to his decreased borrowings of £38m.</p>
<p>What answers did I get?</p>
<p>The first &#8216;answer&#8217; included: &#8220;I&#8217;ve managed it because I am a better person than you are.&#8221; (nice!)</p>
<p>When I asked him to answer the question, rather than try and be personal, his second &#8216;answer&#8217; was to reel off what the additional borrowings would pay for. Well, I can read and that wasn&#8217;t what I&#8217;d asked him.</p>
<p>So I tried again. The third &#8216;answer&#8217; included telling me that I didn&#8217;t understand (quite clearly that&#8217;s why I was asking!!) and that he had explained it.</p>
<p>It was noteworthy that the council’s chief financial officer kept schtum during these questions. So I have had no answer to what I feel is quite a simple question.</p>
<p>Cllr Ron Woodley is either wilfully misleading residents of the town or he is incompetent. I suspect it is the latter, but it would be nice to know!</p>
<p>His budget includes increased council tax, increased charges, increased borrowings and service cuts&#8230;. and he once had the audacity to tell me he was &#8220;the only true Conservative in the [Council] Chamber&#8221;.</p>
]]></html></oembed>