<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins blog]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://jasoncollins.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://jasoncollins.blog/author/jasonacollins/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The recent evolution of musical&nbsp;talent]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>From a <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2012/04/did-humans-invent-music/255945/" target="_blank">debate between Gary Marcus and Geoffrey Miller</a> on the biological basis for musical talent:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Miller:</strong> Music&#8217;s got some key features of an evolved adaptation: It&#8217;s universal across cultures, it&#8217;s ancient in prehistory, and kids learn it early and spontaneously. &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Marcus:</strong> &#8220;Ancient&#8221; seems like a bit of stretch to me. The oldest known musical artifacts are some bone flutes that are only 35,000 years old, a blink in an evolutionary time. &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Miller:</strong> The bone flutes are at least 35,000 years old, but vocal music might be a lot older, given the fossil evidence on humans and Neanderthal vocal tracts. Thirty-five-thousand years sounds short in evolutionary terms, but it&#8217;s still more than a thousand human generations, which is plenty of time for selection to shape a hard-to-learn cultural skill into a talent for music in some people, even if music did originate as a purely cultural invention. Maybe that&#8217;s not enough time to make music into a finely tuned mental ability like language, but nobody knows yet how long these things take.</p></blockquote>
<p>The remainder of the debate is worth a read.</p>
<p>HT: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-brooks/somebody-that-i-used-to-know_b_1436887.html" target="_blank">Rob Brooks</a></p>
]]></html></oembed>