<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins blog]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://jasoncollins.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://jasoncollins.blog/author/jasonacollins/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A week of&nbsp;links]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Links this week:</p>
<ol>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/07/to-war-is-human-perhaps-not/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Brandon Keim discusses</a> a <a href="https://www.sciencemag.org/content/341/6143/270" target="_blank" rel="noopener">new Science paper</a> by Douglas Fry and Patrik Söderberg questioning how warlike human nature is. My two cents: a war to personal violence ratio is a poor way to look at this. If we interpret the ratio in the other direction, we could say that human nature inclines us to high rates of interpersonal violence. I&#8217;d prefer examination of baseline rates.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;">Larry Arnhart has continued his series of posts on the Mont Pelerin Society Meeting in the Galápagos. Two posts of note: <a href="http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com.au/2013/07/the-mps-in-galapagos-evolutionary.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Leda Cosmides and John Tooby on liberalism and mismatch</a>; and <a href="http://darwinianconservatism.blogspot.com.au/2013/07/the-mps-in-galapagos-11-wrangham-on.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Richard Wrangham on the evolution of war</a> (the Wrangham post directly addresses the Science paper linked above).</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/opinion/sunday/lets-shake-up-the-social-sciences.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Nicholas Christakis proposes a shake up</a> of the social sciences. <a href="http://andrewgelman.com/2013/07/21/defensive-political-science-responds-defensively-to-an-attack-on-social-science/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Andrew Gelman responds</a>, Christakis comments and <a href="http://andrewgelman.com/2013/07/23/christakis-response-to-my-comment-on-his-comments-on-social-science/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Gelman responds again</a>.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://economics.com.au/?p=9778" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Paul Frijters goes on a rant</a> on magical explanations for the rise of obesity.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://www.bababrinkman.com/i-want-jeremy-yoders-money/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Baba Brinkman schools Jeremy Yoder</a>.</li>
</ol>
]]></html></oembed>