<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins blog]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://jasoncollins.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://jasoncollins.blog/author/jasonacollins/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A week of&nbsp;links]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p style="margin-bottom:12px;">Links this week:</p>
<ol>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://edge.org/conversation/this-thing-for-which-we-have-no-name" target="_blank">A conversation with Rory Sutherland</a>. Many good pieces, but my favourite line:</li>
</ol>
<blockquote><p>Certainly there&#8217;s a problem with numbers in that there are sophisticated things in life that we all understand perfectly well when verbally described. Should psychology be constrained by math? I mean, who has the better understanding of human behavior—Shakespeare or Eugene Fama? If you make mathematical expression a barrier to entry, to any kind of theory, you are undoubtedly limiting yourselves.</p></blockquote>
<ol start="2">
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/18/opinion/sunday/always-hungry-heres-why.html?smid=tw-nytimes&amp;_r=0" target="_blank">Another article taking a shot at the idea that &#8220;all calories are equal&#8221;</a>.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/may/15/think-like-a-freak-freakonomics-levitt-dubner-review" target="_blank">A not so glowing review</a> of the latest book in the Freakonomics franchise &#8211; <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0062218336/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=0062218336&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=evolvieconom-20&amp;linkId=GVTMT4MC47MWAONE" target="_blank">Think Like a Freak</a>. <a href="http://noahpinionblog.blogspot.com.au/2014/05/market-priesthood.html" target="_blank">Noah Smith also takes a shot</a>.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;"><a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2014/jun/05/stretch-genes/" target="_blank">H. Allen Orr reviews</a> Nicholas Wade&#8217;s <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00G3L7VFM/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&amp;camp=1789&amp;creative=390957&amp;creativeASIN=B00G3L7VFM&amp;linkCode=as2&amp;tag=evolvieconom-20&amp;linkId=RTHPVZR2IIVZRFKB" target="_blank">A Troublesome Inheritance: Genes, Race and Human History</a>.</li>
<li style="margin-bottom:12px;">Two good pieces on the mess that is copyright protection &#8211; <a href="http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/the-party-of-innovation/" target="_blank">an extended riff on barriers to innovation</a> and <a href="http://conversableeconomist.blogspot.com.au/2014/05/absurdities-of-copyright-protection.html" target="_blank">the ridiculous length of copyright terms</a>.</li>
</ol>
]]></html></oembed>