<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins blog]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://jasoncollins.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Jason Collins]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://jasoncollins.blog/author/jasonacollins/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[My research]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I completed a PhD at the University of Western Australia. My thesis can be downloaded <a href="http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/essays-on-human-evolution-and-economic-growth(6774b3ff-35f0-454c-b788-cc7ad35184ae).html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">here</a>, although the chapters that make up the thesis (and subsequent publications) are below.</p>
<p><strong>Publications</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?aid=8946304" target="_blank" rel="noopener">&#8220;Economic Growth and Evolution: Parental Preferences for Quality and Quantity of Offspring&#8221;</a> (2014) <em>Macroeconomic Dynamics</em> 18, pp. 1773-1796 (with Boris Baer and Juerg Weber) (<a href="https://jasonallancollins.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/collins-et-al-2014-economic-growth-and-evolution.pdf">ungated pdf</a>): In this paper we look at the model developed in Galor and Moav (2002)<em> Natural Selection and the Origin of Economic Growth</em>. You can find a post describing the paper <a title="Economic growth and evolution: Parental preference for quality and quantity of offspring" href="http://www.jasoncollins.blog/2013/07/economic-growth-and-evolution-parental-preference-for-quality-and-quantity-of-offspring/">here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10818-015-9200-9" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sexual Selection, Conspicuous Consumption and Economic Growth</a> (2015) <em>Journal of Bioeconomics</em> 17(2), pp. 189-206 (with Boris Baer and Juerg Weber) (<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2111740" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ungated working paper</a>): We examine the effect of the evolution of conspicuous consumption on economic growth. You can read a post on my paper <a title="Sexual selection, conspicuous consumption and economic growth" href="http://www.jasoncollins.blog/2012/08/sexual-selection-conspicuous-consumption-and-economic-growth/">here</a>. Coverage of the paper includes Tom Whipple in <a href="http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/science/article4453305.ece" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Times</a>, Sarah Griffiths in <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-3100584/Peacocking-males-splash-cash-impress-women-help-boost-economy-Study-finds-link-sexual-selection-economic-growth.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Daily Mail</a>, Rob Brooks in <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/rob-brooks/sexual-signalling-powers-_b_1845337.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Huffington Post</a> and <a href="http://theconversation.edu.au/sexual-signalling-powers-the-economy-8780" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Conversation</a>, Chris Dillow at <a href="http://stumblingandmumbling.typepad.com/stumbling_and_mumbling/2012/10/sex-growth.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Stumbling and Mumbling</a>, Steve Sailer at<a href="http://isteve.blogspot.com.au/2012/10/sexual-selection-conspicuous.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> iSteve</a>, and Matt Ridley in <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323551004578116903873762428.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener">The Wall Street Journal</a>. I was <a href="https://jasonallancollins.files.wordpress.com/2012/04/uwanews15_1-oct-2012.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noopener">profiled in UWA News</a> after release of the working paper. And Paul Frijters has prepared a critique of an earlier version, which you can <a title="Critique of conspicuous consumption and economic growth" href="http://www.jasoncollins.blog/2012/11/critique-of-conspicuous-consumption-and-economic-growth/" target="_blank" rel="noopener">find here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.2075/abstract" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Sperm use economy of honeybee (Apis mellifera) queens</a> (2016) <em>Ecology and Evolution </em>(with Boris Baer, Kristiina Maalaps and Susanne P. A. den Boer)</p>
<p><a href="http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1475-4932.12260/abstract" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Economics in Evolutionary Biology: A Review</a> (2016) <em>Economic Record</em> (with Boris Baer and Juerg Weber) (<a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2599805" target="_blank" rel="noopener">ungated working paper</a>): A review of how evolutionary biology has been incorporated into economic thinking.</p>
<p><strong>Working papers</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2208886" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Evolution, Fertility and the Ageing Population</a> (with Oliver Richards): We hypothesise that because the heritability of fertility increased after the demographic transition, natural selection should drive an increase in fertility. This may affect projections of the fiscal effects of the &#8220;ageing population&#8221;. A post giving some background to the paper <a title="Fertility is going to go up" href="http://www.jasoncollins.blog/2013/01/fertility-is-going-to-go-up/">is here</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://ssrn.com/abstract=2284456" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Population, Technological Progress and the Evolution of Innovative Potential</a> (with Boris Baer and Juerg Weber): As more people means both more ideas and more mutations, we develop a dual-driver model of evolutionary growth in which both the increasing quantity and evolving innovative potential of the population drives economic growth. My post on the paper <a title="Population, technological progress and the evolution of innovative potential" href="http://www.jasoncollins.blog/2013/07/population-technological-progress-and-the-evolution-of-innovative-potential/">is here</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>