<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Jumped The Snark]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://jumpedthesnark.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[skeim01]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://jumpedthesnark.com/author/skeim01/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[NBC Admits Mistake, Pretends It Will Focus on Quality&nbsp;Programming]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>NBCU Television Entertainment Chairman Jeff Gaspin stated yesterday that, when referring to his network&#8217;s programming strategy, &#8220;The goal is not to manage for margins. It is to put the best possible programs we can on the air.&#8221;  AKA he was apologizing for Jay Leno, and the mess it created.  Of course he&#8217;s only sorry because the experiment failed.  However, it&#8217;s good to know that NBC will welcoming quality shows again.</p>
<p>Of course, what he really meant is that the goal is to &#8220;put the best possible programs we can on the air that will also net us the best ratings.&#8221;  They learned that it&#8217;s not just enough to make a profit, as the <em>Jay Leno Show </em>is sorta doing, but that you have to garner strong audiences as well.  Let&#8217;s not confuse this with a willingness to put brilliant programs before ratings.  If that were the case <em>Freaks and Geeks </em>would have run for seven years.  No, this just means that while we will see some new comedies and dramas we&#8217;ll also see <a href="http://jumpedthesnark.com/2009/10/20/nbc-going-for-more-biggest-loser-does-not-appreciate-the-irony/" target="_blank">more </a><em><a href="http://jumpedthesnark.com/2009/10/20/nbc-going-for-more-biggest-loser-does-not-appreciate-the-irony/" target="_blank">Biggest Losers</a>.</em> Cheap shows that also pull in big numbers.  For them, that&#8217;s the &#8220;best possible program&#8221; (and not sure I can say I blame them).</p>
<p>via <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/22/AR2009102204314.html" target="_blank">The TV Column, <em>Washington Post</em></a></p>
]]></html></oembed>