<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Geometry and the imagination]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://lamington.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Danny Calegari]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://lamington.wordpress.com/author/dannycaltech/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Big mapping class groups and&nbsp;dynamics]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Mapping class groups (also called modular groups) are of central importance in many fields of geometry. If <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> is an oriented surface (i.e. a <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="2" title="2" class="latex" />-manifold), the group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D%5E%2B%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S)" title="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S)" class="latex" /> of orientation-preserving self-homeomorphisms of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> is a <em>topological group</em> with the compact-open topology. The <em>mapping class group</em> of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" />, denoted <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMCG%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" title="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" class="latex" /> (or <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMod%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{Mod}(S)" title="&#92;text{Mod}(S)" class="latex" /> by some people) is the group of path-components of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D%5E%2B%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S)" title="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S)" class="latex" />, i.e. <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cpi_0%28%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D%5E%2B%28S%29%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;pi_0(&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S))" title="&#92;pi_0(&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S))" class="latex" />, or equivalently <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D%5E%2B%28S%29%2F%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D_0%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S)/&#92;text{Homeo}_0(S)" title="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S)/&#92;text{Homeo}_0(S)" class="latex" /> where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D_0%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{Homeo}_0(S)" title="&#92;text{Homeo}_0(S)" class="latex" /> is the subgroup of homeomorphisms isotopic to the identity.</p>
<p>When <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> is a surface of finite type (i.e. a closed surface minus finitely many points), the group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMCG%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" title="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" class="latex" /> is finitely presented, and one knows a great deal about the algebra and geometry of this group. Less well-studied are groups of the form <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMCG%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" title="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" class="latex" /> when <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> is of <em>infinite</em> type. However, such groups do arise naturally in dynamics.</p>
<p><strong>Example:</strong> Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> be a group of (orientation-preserving) homeomorphisms of the plane, and suppose that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> has a bounded orbit (i.e. there is some point <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=p&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="p" title="p" class="latex" /> for which the orbit <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=Gp&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="Gp" title="Gp" class="latex" /> is contained in a compact subset of the plane). The closure of such an orbit <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=Gp&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="Gp" title="Gp" class="latex" /> is compact and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" />-invariant. Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=K&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="K" title="K" class="latex" /> be the union of the closure of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=Gp&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="Gp" title="Gp" class="latex" /> with the set of bounded open complementary regions. Then <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=K&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="K" title="K" class="latex" /> is compact, <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" />-invariant, and has connected complement. Define an equivalence relation <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Csim&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;sim" title="&#92;sim" class="latex" /> on the plane whose equivalence classes are the points in the complement of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=K&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="K" title="K" class="latex" />, and the connected components of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=K&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="K" title="K" class="latex" />. The quotient of the plane by this equivalence relation is again homeomorphic to the plane (by a theorem of R. L. Moore), and the image of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=K&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="K" title="K" class="latex" /> is a totally disconnected set <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=k&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="k" title="k" class="latex" />. The original group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> admits a natural homomorphism to the mapping class group of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2+-+k&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - k" title="&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - k" class="latex" />. After passing to a <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" />-invariant closed subset of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=k&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="k" title="k" class="latex" /> if necessary, we may assume that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=k&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="k" title="k" class="latex" /> is minimal (i.e. every orbit is dense). Since <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=k&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="k" title="k" class="latex" /> is compact, it is either a finite discrete set, or it is a Cantor set.</p>
<p>The mapping class group of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7Bfinite+set%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - &#92;text{finite set}" title="&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - &#92;text{finite set}" class="latex" /> contains a subgroup of finite index fixing the end of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{R}^2" title="&#92;mathbb{R}^2" class="latex" />; this subgroup is the quotient of a <em>braid group</em> by its center. There are many tools that show that certain groups <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> cannot have a big image in such a mapping class group.</p>
<p>Much less studied is the case that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=k&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="k" title="k" class="latex" /> is a Cantor set. In the remainder of this post, we will abbreviate <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMCG%7D%28%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7BCantor+set%7D%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{MCG}(&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set})" title="&#92;text{MCG}(&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set})" class="latex" /> by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" />. Notice that any homeomorphism of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BR%7D%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7BCantor+set%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" title="&#92;mathbb{R}^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" class="latex" /> extends in a unique way to a homeomorphism of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^2" title="S^2" class="latex" />, fixing the point at infinity, and permuting the points of the Cantor set (this can be seen by thinking of the &#8220;missing points&#8221; intrinsically as the space of <em>ends</em> of the surface). Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma&#039;" title="&#92;Gamma&#039;" class="latex" /> denote the mapping class group of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7BCantor+set%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" title="S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" class="latex" />. Then there is a natural surjection <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma+%5Cto+%5CGamma%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma &#92;to &#92;Gamma&#039;" title="&#92;Gamma &#92;to &#92;Gamma&#039;" class="latex" /> whose kernel is <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cpi_1%28S%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7BCantor+set%7D%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;pi_1(S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set})" title="&#92;pi_1(S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set})" class="latex" /> (this is just the familiar Birman exact sequence).</p>
<p>The following is proved in the first section of <a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0403311">my paper</a> &#8220;Circular groups, planar groups and the Euler class&#8221;. This is the first step to showing that any group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> of orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms of the plane with a bounded orbit is circularly orderable:</p>
<p><strong>Proposition:</strong> There is an injective homomorphism <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma+%5Cto+%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D%5E%2B%28S%5E1%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma &#92;to &#92;text{Homeo}^+(S^1)" title="&#92;Gamma &#92;to &#92;text{Homeo}^+(S^1)" class="latex" />.</p>
<p><em>Sketch of Proof:</em> Choose a complete hyperbolic structure on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7BCantor+set%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" title="S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" class="latex" />. The <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0243519">Birman exact sequence</a> exhibits <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> as a group of (equivalence classes) of homeomorphisms of the universal cover of this hyperbolic surface which commute with the deck group. Each such homeomorphism extends in a unique way to a homeomorphism of the circle at infinity. This extension does not depend on the choice of a representative in an equivalence class, and one can check that the extension of a nontrivial mapping class is nontrivial at infinity. qed.</p>
<p>This property of the mapping class group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> does not distinguish it from mapping class groups of surfaces of finite type (with punctures); in fact, the argument is barely sensitive to the topology of the surface at all. By contrast, the next theorem demonstrates a significant difference between mapping class groups of surfaces of finite type, and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" />. Recall that for a surface <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> of finite type, the group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMCG%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" title="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" class="latex" /> acts simplicially on the <em>complex of curves</em> <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathcal%7BC%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathcal{C}(S)" title="&#92;mathcal{C}(S)" class="latex" />, a simplicial complex whose simplices are the sets of isotopy classes of essential simple closed curves in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> that can be realized mutually disjointly. A fundamental theorem of <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1714338">Masur-Minsky</a> says that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathcal%7BC%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathcal{C}(S)" title="&#92;mathcal{C}(S)" class="latex" /> (with its natural simplicial path metric) is <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cdelta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;delta" title="&#92;delta" class="latex" />-hyperbolic (though it is not locally finite). <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1914565">Bestvina-Fujiwara</a> show that any reasonably big subgroup of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BMCG%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" title="&#92;text{MCG}(S)" class="latex" /> contains lots of elements that act on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathcal%7BC%7D%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathcal{C}(S)" title="&#92;mathcal{C}(S)" class="latex" /> weakly properly, and therefore such groups admit many nontrivial quasimorphisms. This has many important consequences, and shows that for many interesting classes of groups, every homomorphism to a mapping class group (of finite type) factors through a finite group. In view of the potential applications to dynamics as above, one would like to be able to construct quasimorphisms on mapping class groups of infinite type.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, this does not seem so easy.</p>
<p><strong>Proposition:</strong> The group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma&#039;" title="&#92;Gamma&#039;" class="latex" /> is uniformly perfect.</p>
<p><em>Proof:</em> Remember that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma&#039;" title="&#92;Gamma&#039;" class="latex" /> denotes the mapping class group of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E2+-+%5Ctext%7BCantor+set%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" title="S^2 - &#92;text{Cantor set}" class="latex" />. We denote the Cantor set in the sequel by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />.</p>
<p>A closed disk <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D" title="D" class="latex" /> is a <em>dividing disk</em> if its boundary is disjoint from <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />, and separates <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" /> into two components (both necessarily Cantor sets). An element <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g+%5Cin+%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" title="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> is said to be <em>local</em> if it has a representative whose support is contained in a dividing disk. Note that the closure of the complement of a dividing disk is also a dividing disk. Given any dividing disk <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D" title="D" class="latex" />, there is a homeomorphism of the sphere <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cvarphi&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;varphi" title="&#92;varphi" class="latex" /> permuting <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />, that takes <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D" title="D" class="latex" /> off itself, and so that the family of disks <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cvarphi%5En%28D%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;varphi^n(D)" title="&#92;varphi^n(D)" class="latex" /> are pairwise disjoint, and converge to a limiting point <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=x+%5Cin+C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="x &#92;in C" title="x &#92;in C" class="latex" />. Define <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h" title="h" class="latex" /> to be the infinite product <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h+%3D+%5Cprod_i+%5Cvarphi%5Ei+g+%5Cvarphi%5E%7B-i%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h = &#92;prod_i &#92;varphi^i g &#92;varphi^{-i}" title="h = &#92;prod_i &#92;varphi^i g &#92;varphi^{-i}" class="latex" />. Notice that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h" title="h" class="latex" /> is a well-defined homeomorphism of the plane permuting <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />. Moreover, there is an identity <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Bh%5E%7B-1%7D%2C%5Cvarphi%5D+%3D+g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="[h^{-1},&#92;varphi] = g" title="[h^{-1},&#92;varphi] = g" class="latex" />, thereby exhibiting <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> as a commutator. The theorem will therefore be proved if we can exhibit any element of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma&#039;" title="&#92;Gamma&#039;" class="latex" /> as a bounded product of local elements.</p>
<p>Now, let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> be an arbitrary homeomorphism of the sphere permuting <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />. Pick an arbitrary <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=p+%5Cin+C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="p &#92;in C" title="p &#92;in C" class="latex" />. If <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%28p%29%3Dp&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g(p)=p" title="g(p)=p" class="latex" /> then let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h" title="h" class="latex" /> be a local homeomorphism taking <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=p&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="p" title="p" class="latex" /> to a disjoint point <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=q&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="q" title="q" class="latex" />, and define <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%27+%3D+hg&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g&#039; = hg" title="g&#039; = hg" class="latex" />. So without loss of generality, we can find <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%27+%3D+hg&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g&#039; = hg" title="g&#039; = hg" class="latex" /> where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h" title="h" class="latex" /> is local (possibly trivial), and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%27%28p%29+%3D+q+%5Cne+p&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g&#039;(p) = q &#92;ne p" title="g&#039;(p) = q &#92;ne p" class="latex" />. Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7B%7DE&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="{}E" title="{}E" class="latex" /> be a sufficiently small dividing disk containing <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=p&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="p" title="p" class="latex" /> so that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%27%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g&#039;(E)" title="g&#039;(E)" class="latex" /> is disjoint from <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7B%7DE&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="{}E" title="{}E" class="latex" />, and their union does not contain every point of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />. Join <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7B%7DE&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="{}E" title="{}E" class="latex" /> to <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%27%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g&#039;(E)" title="g&#039;(E)" class="latex" /> by a path in the complement of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />, and let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D" title="D" class="latex" /> be a regular neighborhood, which by construction is a dividing disk. Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=f&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="f" title="f" class="latex" /> be a local homeomorphism, supported in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D" title="D" class="latex" />, that interchanges <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7B%7DE&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="{}E" title="{}E" class="latex" /> and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%27%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g&#039;(E)" title="g&#039;(E)" class="latex" />, and so that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=f+g%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="f g&#039;" title="f g&#039;" class="latex" /> is the identity on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D" title="D" class="latex" />. Then <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=fg%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="fg&#039;" title="fg&#039;" class="latex" /> is itself local, because the complement of the interior of a dividing disk is also a dividing disk, and we have expressed <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> as a product of at most three local homeomorphisms. This shows that the commutator length of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> is at most <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=3&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="3" title="3" class="latex" />, and since <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> was arbitrary, we are done. qed.</p>
<p>The same argument just barely fails to work with <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> in place of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma&#039;" title="&#92;Gamma&#039;" class="latex" />. One can also define dividing disks and local homeomorphisms in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" />, with the following important difference. One can show by the same argument that local homeomorphisms in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> are commutators, and that for an arbitrary element <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g+%5Cin+%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" title="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> there are local elements <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h%2Cf&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h,f" title="h,f" class="latex" /> so that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=fhg&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="fhg" title="fhg" class="latex" /> is the identity on a dividing disk; i.e. this composition is <em>anti-local</em>. However, the complement of the interior of a dividing disk in the plane is not a dividing disk; the difference can be measured by keeping track of the point at infinity. This is a restatement of the Birman exact sequence; at the level of quasimorphisms, one has the following exact sequence: <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=Q%28%5CGamma%27%29+%5Cto+Q%28%5CGamma%29+%5Cto+Q%28%5Cpi_1%28S%5E2+-+C%29%29%5E%7B%5CGamma%27%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="Q(&#92;Gamma&#039;) &#92;to Q(&#92;Gamma) &#92;to Q(&#92;pi_1(S^2 - C))^{&#92;Gamma&#039;}" title="Q(&#92;Gamma&#039;) &#92;to Q(&#92;Gamma) &#92;to Q(&#92;pi_1(S^2 - C))^{&#92;Gamma&#039;}" class="latex" />.</p>
<p>The so-called &#8220;point-pushing&#8221; subgroup <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cpi_1%28S%5E2+-+C%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;pi_1(S^2 - C)" title="&#92;pi_1(S^2 - C)" class="latex" /> can be understood geometrically by tracking the image of a proper ray from <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" /> to infinity. We are therefore motivated to consider the following object:</p>
<p><strong>Definition:</strong> The <em>ray graph</em> <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="R" title="R" class="latex" /> is the graph whose vertex set is the set of isotopy classes of proper rays <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=r&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="r" title="r" class="latex" />, with interior in the complement of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />, from a point in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" /> to infinity, and whose edges are the pairs of such rays that can be realized disjointly.</p>
<p>One can verify that the graph <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="R" title="R" class="latex" /> is connected, and that the group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> acts simplicially on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="R" title="R" class="latex" /> by automorphisms, and transitively on vertices.</p>
<p><strong>Lemma:</strong> Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g+%5Cin+%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" title="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> and suppose there is a vertex <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=v+%5Cin+R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="v &#92;in R" title="v &#92;in R" class="latex" /> such that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=v%2Cg%28v%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="v,g(v)" title="v,g(v)" class="latex" /> share an edge. Then <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> is a product of at most two local homeomorphisms.</p>
<p><em>Sketch of proof:</em> After adjusting <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> by an isotopy, assume that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=r&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="r" title="r" class="latex" /> and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%28r%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g(r)" title="g(r)" class="latex" /> are actually disjoint. Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E%2Cg%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E,g(E)" title="E,g(E)" class="latex" /> be sufficiently small disjoint disks about the endpoint of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=r&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="r" title="r" class="latex" /> and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%28r%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g(r)" title="g(r)" class="latex" />, and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha" title="&#92;alpha" class="latex" /> an arc from <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7B%7DE&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="{}E" title="{}E" class="latex" /> to <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g(E)" title="g(E)" class="latex" /> disjoint from <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=r&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="r" title="r" class="latex" /> and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g%28r%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g(r)" title="g(r)" class="latex" />, so that the union <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=r+%5Ccup+E+%5Ccup+%5Calpha+%5Ccup+g%28E%29+%5Ccup+g%28r%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="r &#92;cup E &#92;cup &#92;alpha &#92;cup g(E) &#92;cup g(r)" title="r &#92;cup E &#92;cup &#92;alpha &#92;cup g(E) &#92;cup g(r)" class="latex" /> does not separate the part of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" /> outside <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E+%5Ccup+g%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E &#92;cup g(E)" title="E &#92;cup g(E)" class="latex" />. Then this union can be engulfed in a punctured disk <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D&#039;" title="D&#039;" class="latex" /> containing infinity, whose complement contains some of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="C" title="C" class="latex" />. There is a local <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=h&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="h" title="h" class="latex" /> supported in a neighborhood of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E+%5Ccup+%5Calpha+%5Ccup+g%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E &#92;cup &#92;alpha &#92;cup g(E)" title="E &#92;cup &#92;alpha &#92;cup g(E)" class="latex" /> such that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=hg&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="hg" title="hg" class="latex" /> is supported (after isotopy) in the complement of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=D%27&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="D&#039;" title="D&#039;" class="latex" /> (i.e. it is also local). qed.</p>
<p>It follows that if <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g+%5Cin%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g &#92;in&#92;Gamma" title="g &#92;in&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> has a bounded orbit in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="R" title="R" class="latex" />, then the commutator lengths of the powers of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g" title="g" class="latex" /> are bounded, and therefore <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7Bscl%7D%28g%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{scl}(g)" title="&#92;text{scl}(g)" class="latex" /> vanishes. If this is true for every <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g+%5Cin+%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" title="g &#92;in &#92;Gamma" class="latex" />, then Bavard duality implies that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> admits no nontrivial homogeneous quasimorphisms. This motivates the following questions:</p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> Is the diameter of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="R" title="R" class="latex" /> infinite? (Exercise: show <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7Bdiam%7D%28R%29%5Cge+3&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{diam}(R)&#92;ge 3" title="&#92;text{diam}(R)&#92;ge 3" class="latex" />)</p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> Does any element of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" /> act on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=R&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="R" title="R" class="latex" /> with positive translation length?</p>
<p><strong>Question:</strong> Can one use this action to construct nontrivial quasimorphisms on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CGamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Gamma" title="&#92;Gamma" class="latex" />?</p>
]]></html></oembed>