<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Geometry and the imagination]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://lamington.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Danny Calegari]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://lamington.wordpress.com/author/dannycaltech/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Harmonic measure]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>An amenable group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> acting by homeomorphisms on a compact topological space <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" /> preserves a probability measure on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" />; in fact, one can given a definition of amenability in such terms. For example, if <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> is finite, it preserves an atomic measure supported on any orbit. If <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G+%3D+%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G = &#92;mathbb{Z}" title="G = &#92;mathbb{Z}" class="latex" />, one can take a sequence of almost invariant probability measures, supported on the subset <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5B-n%2Cn%5D+%5Ccdot+p&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="[-n,n] &#92;cdot p" title="[-n,n] &#92;cdot p" class="latex" /> (where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=p+%5Cin+X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="p &#92;in X" title="p &#92;in X" class="latex" /> is arbitrary), and any weak limit will be invariant. For a general amenable group, in place of the subsets <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5B-n%2Cn%5D+%5Csubset+%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="[-n,n] &#92;subset &#92;mathbb{Z}" title="[-n,n] &#92;subset &#92;mathbb{Z}" class="latex" />, one works with a sequence of <em>Folner sets</em>; i.e. subsets with the property that the ratio of their size to the size of their boundary goes to zero (so to speak).</p>
<p>But if <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> is not amenable, it is generally not true that there is any probability measure on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" /> invariant under the action of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" />. The best one can expect is a probability measure which is invariant <em>on average</em>. Such a measure is called a <em>harmonic measure</em> (or a <em>stationary measure</em>) for the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" />-action on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" />. To be concrete, suppose <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> is finitely generated by a symmetric generating set <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> (symmetric here means that if <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=s+%5Cin+S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="s &#92;in S" title="s &#92;in S" class="latex" />, then <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=s%5E%7B-1%7D+%5Cin+S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="s^{-1} &#92;in S" title="s^{-1} &#92;in S" class="latex" />). Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M%28X%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M(X)" title="M(X)" class="latex" /> denote the space of probability measures on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" />. One can form an operator <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CDelta%3AM%28X%29+%5Cto+M%28X%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Delta:M(X) &#92;to M(X)" title="&#92;Delta:M(X) &#92;to M(X)" class="latex" /> defined by the formula</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CDelta%28%5Cmu%29+%3D+%5Cfrac+%7B1%7D+%7B%7CS%7C%7D+%5Csum_%7Bs+%5Cin+S%7D+s_%2A%5Cmu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Delta(&#92;mu) = &#92;frac {1} {|S|} &#92;sum_{s &#92;in S} s_*&#92;mu" title="&#92;Delta(&#92;mu) = &#92;frac {1} {|S|} &#92;sum_{s &#92;in S} s_*&#92;mu" class="latex" /></p>
<p>and then look for a probability measure <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cnu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;nu" title="&#92;nu" class="latex" /> stationary under <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CDelta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Delta" title="&#92;Delta" class="latex" />, which exists for quite general reasons. This measure <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cnu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;nu" title="&#92;nu" class="latex" /> is the harmonic measure: the expectation of the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cnu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;nu" title="&#92;nu" class="latex" />-measure of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=s%28A%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="s(A)" title="s(A)" class="latex" /> under a randomly chosen <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=s+%5Cin+S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="s &#92;in S" title="s &#92;in S" class="latex" /> is equal to the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cnu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;nu" title="&#92;nu" class="latex" />-measure of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=A&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="A" title="A" class="latex" />. Note for any probability measure <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mu" title="&#92;mu" class="latex" /> that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=s_%2A%5Cmu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="s_*&#92;mu" title="s_*&#92;mu" class="latex" /> is absolutely continuous with respect to <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5CDelta%28%5Cmu%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;Delta(&#92;mu)" title="&#92;Delta(&#92;mu)" class="latex" />; in fact, the Radon-Nikodym derivative satisfies <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=ds_%2A%5Cmu%2Fd%5CDelta%28%5Cmu%29+%5Cle+%7CS%7C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="ds_*&#92;mu/d&#92;Delta(&#92;mu) &#92;le |S|" title="ds_*&#92;mu/d&#92;Delta(&#92;mu) &#92;le |S|" class="latex" />. Substituting <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cnu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;nu" title="&#92;nu" class="latex" /> for <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mu" title="&#92;mu" class="latex" /> in this formula, one sees that the measure class of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cnu&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;nu" title="&#92;nu" class="latex" /> is preserved by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" />, and that for every <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=g+%5Cin+G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="g &#92;in G" title="g &#92;in G" class="latex" />, we have <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=dg_%2A%5Cnu%2Fd%5Cnu+%5Cle+%7CS%7C%5E%7B%7Cg%7C%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="dg_*&#92;nu/d&#92;nu &#92;le |S|^{|g|}" title="dg_*&#92;nu/d&#92;nu &#92;le |S|^{|g|}" class="latex" />, where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7Cg%7C&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="|g|" title="|g|" class="latex" /> denotes word length with respect to the given generating set.</p>
<p>The existence of harmonic measure is especially useful when <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" /> is one-dimensional, e.g. in the case that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X%3DS%5E1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X=S^1" title="X=S^1" class="latex" />. In one dimension, a measure (at least one of full support without atoms) can be &#8220;integrated&#8221; to a path metric. Consequently, any finitely generated group of homeomorphisms of the circle is conjugate to a group of bilipschitz homeomorphisms (if the harmonic measure associated to the original action does not have full support, or has atoms, one can &#8220;throw in&#8221; another random generator to the group; the resulting action can be assumed to have a harmonic measure of full support without atoms, which can be integrated to give a structure with respect to which the group action is bilipschitz). In fact, <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2358052">Deroin-Kleptsyn-Navas</a> showed that any <em>countable</em> group of homeomorphisms of the circle (or interval) is conjugate to a group of bilipschitz homeomorphisms (the hypothesis that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> be countable is essential; for example, the group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%5E%7B%5Cmathbb%7BZ%7D%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{Z}^{&#92;mathbb{Z}}" title="&#92;mathbb{Z}^{&#92;mathbb{Z}}" class="latex" /> acts in a non-bilipschitz way on the interval &#8212; see <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2443241">here</a>).</p>
<p>Suppose now that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G+%3D+%5Cpi_1%28M%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G = &#92;pi_1(M)" title="G = &#92;pi_1(M)" class="latex" /> for some manifold <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" />. The action of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G" title="G" class="latex" /> on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^1" title="S^1" class="latex" /> determines a <em>foliated circle bundle</em> <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E1+%5Cto+E+%5Cto+M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^1 &#92;to E &#92;to M" title="S^1 &#92;to E &#92;to M" class="latex" />; i.e. a circle bundle, together with a codimension one foliation transverse to the circle fibers. To see this, first form the product <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidetilde%7BM%7D+%5Ctimes+S%5E1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widetilde{M} &#92;times S^1" title="&#92;widetilde{M} &#92;times S^1" class="latex" /> with its product foliation by leaves <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidetilde%7BM%7D+%5Ctimes+%5Ctext%7Bpoint%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widetilde{M} &#92;times &#92;text{point}" title="&#92;widetilde{M} &#92;times &#92;text{point}" class="latex" />, where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidetilde%7BM%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widetilde{M}" title="&#92;widetilde{M}" class="latex" /> denotes the universal cover of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" />. The group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=G+%3D+%5Cpi_1%28M%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="G = &#92;pi_1(M)" title="G = &#92;pi_1(M)" class="latex" /> acts on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidetilde%7BM%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widetilde{M}" title="&#92;widetilde{M}" class="latex" /> as the deck group of the covering, and on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S%5E1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S^1" title="S^1" class="latex" /> by the given action; the quotient of this diagonal action on the product is the desired circle bundle <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" />. The foliation makes <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" /> into a &#8220;flat&#8221; circle bundle with structure group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BHomeo%7D%5E%2B%28S%5E1%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S^1)" title="&#92;text{Homeo}^+(S^1)" class="latex" />. The foliation allows us to associate to each path <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" /> in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> a homeomorphism from the fiber over <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma%280%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma(0)" title="&#92;gamma(0)" class="latex" /> to the fiber over <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma%281%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma(1)" title="&#92;gamma(1)" class="latex" />; integrability (or flatness) implies that this homeomorphism only depends on the relative homotopy class of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" /> in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" />. This identification of fibers is called the <em>holonomy</em> of the foliation along the path <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" />. If <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> is a Riemannian manifold, there is another kind of harmonic measure on the circle bundle; in other words, a probability measure on each circle with the property that the holonomy associated to an infinitesimal random walk on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> preserves the expected value of the measure. This is (very closely related to) a special case of a construction due to <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0703080">Lucy Garnett</a> which associates a <em>harmonic transverse measure</em> to any foliation <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathcal%7BF%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathcal{F}" title="&#92;mathcal{F}" class="latex" /> of a manifold <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=N&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="N" title="N" class="latex" />, by finding a fixed point of the <em>leafwise heat flow</em> on the space of probability measures on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=N&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="N" title="N" class="latex" />, and disintegrating this measure into the product of the leafwise area measure, and a &#8220;harmonic&#8221; transverse measure.</p>
<p>In any case, we normalize our foliated circle bundle so that each circle has length <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=2%5Cpi&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="2&#92;pi" title="2&#92;pi" class="latex" /> in its harmonic measure. Let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" /> be the vector field on the circle bundle that rotates each circle at unit speed, and let <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha" title="&#92;alpha" class="latex" /> be the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />-form on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" /> whose kernel is tangent to the leaves of the foliation. We scale <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha" title="&#92;alpha" class="latex" /> so that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha%28X%29%3D1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha(X)=1" title="&#92;alpha(X)=1" class="latex" /> everywhere. The integrability condition for a foliation is expressed in terms of the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />-form as the identity <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha+%5Cwedge+d%5Calpha+%3D+0&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha &#92;wedge d&#92;alpha = 0" title="&#92;alpha &#92;wedge d&#92;alpha = 0" class="latex" />, and we can write <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=d%5Calpha+%3D+-%5Cbeta+%5Cwedge+%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="d&#92;alpha = -&#92;beta &#92;wedge &#92;alpha" title="d&#92;alpha = -&#92;beta &#92;wedge &#92;alpha" class="latex" /> where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cbeta%28X%29%3D0&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;beta(X)=0" title="&#92;beta(X)=0" class="latex" />. More intrinsically, <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cbeta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;beta" title="&#92;beta" class="latex" /> descends to a <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />-form on the leaves of the foliation which measures the logarithm of the rate at which the transverse measure expands under holonomy in a given direction (the leafwise form <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cbeta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;beta" title="&#92;beta" class="latex" /> is sometimes called the <em>Godbillon class</em>, since it is &#8220;half&#8221; of the Godbillon-Vey class associated to a codimension one foliation; see e.g. <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=1994394">Candel-Conlon volume 2</a>, Chapter 7). Identifying the universal cover of each leaf with <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidetilde%7BM%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widetilde{M}" title="&#92;widetilde{M}" class="latex" /> by projection, the fact that our measure is harmonic means that <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cbeta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;beta" title="&#92;beta" class="latex" /> &#8220;is&#8221; the gradient of the logarithm of a positive harmonic function on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidetilde%7BM%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widetilde{M}" title="&#92;widetilde{M}" class="latex" />. As observed by Thurston, the geometry of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> then puts constraints on the size of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cbeta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;beta" title="&#92;beta" class="latex" />. The following discussion is taken largely from Thurston&#8217;s paper &#8220;Three-manifolds, foliations and circles II&#8221; (unfortunately this mostly unwritten paper is not publicly available; some details can be found in my <a href="http://www.ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=2327361">foliations book</a>, example 4.6).</p>
<p>An orthogonal connection on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" /> can be obtained by averaging <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha" title="&#92;alpha" class="latex" /> under the flow of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" />; i.e. if <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cphi_t&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;phi_t" title="&#92;phi_t" class="latex" /> is the diffeomorphism of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" /> which rotates each circle through angle <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=t&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="t" title="t" class="latex" />, then</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Comega+%3D+%5Cfrac+%7B1%7D+%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%5Cphi_t%5E%2A+%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;omega = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} &#92;int_{0}^{2&#92;pi} &#92;phi_t^* &#92;alpha" title="&#92;omega = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} &#92;int_{0}^{2&#92;pi} &#92;phi_t^* &#92;alpha" class="latex" /></p>
<p>is an <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=X&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="X" title="X" class="latex" />-invariant <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />-form on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" />, which therefore descends to a <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />-form on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" />, which can be thought of as a connection form for an <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7BSO%7D%282%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{SO}(2)" title="&#92;text{SO}(2)" class="latex" />-structure on the bundle <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" />. The curvature of the connection (in the usual sense) is the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="2" title="2" class="latex" />-form <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=d%5Comega&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="d&#92;omega" title="d&#92;omega" class="latex" />, and we have a formula</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=d%5Comega+%3D+%5Cfrac+%7B1%7D+%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%5Cphi_t%5E%2A%28d%5Calpha%29+%3D+%5Cfrac+%7B1%7D+%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%5Cint_%7B0%7D%5E%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%5Cphi_t%5E%2A%28-%5Cbeta+%5Cwedge+%5Calpha%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="d&#92;omega = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} &#92;int_{0}^{2&#92;pi} &#92;phi_t^*(d&#92;alpha) = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} &#92;int_{0}^{2&#92;pi} &#92;phi_t^*(-&#92;beta &#92;wedge &#92;alpha)" title="d&#92;omega = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} &#92;int_{0}^{2&#92;pi} &#92;phi_t^*(d&#92;alpha) = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} &#92;int_{0}^{2&#92;pi} &#92;phi_t^*(-&#92;beta &#92;wedge &#92;alpha)" class="latex" /></p>
<p>The action of the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />-parameter group <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cphi_t&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;phi_t" title="&#92;phi_t" class="latex" /> trivializes the cotangent bundle to <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" /> over each fiber. After choosing such a trivialization, we can think of the values of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha" title="&#92;alpha" class="latex" /> at each point on a fiber as sweeping out a circle <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" /> in a fixed vector space <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=V&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="V" title="V" class="latex" />. The tangent to this circle is found by taking the Lie derivative</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathcal%7BL%7D_X%28%5Calpha%29+%3D+%5Ciota_X+d%5Calpha+%2B+d%5Ciota_X+%5Calpha+%3D+%5Calpha%28X%29%5Cbeta+%3D+%5Cbeta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathcal{L}_X(&#92;alpha) = &#92;iota_X d&#92;alpha + d&#92;iota_X &#92;alpha = &#92;alpha(X)&#92;beta = &#92;beta" title="&#92;mathcal{L}_X(&#92;alpha) = &#92;iota_X d&#92;alpha + d&#92;iota_X &#92;alpha = &#92;alpha(X)&#92;beta = &#92;beta" class="latex" /></p>
<p>In other words, <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cbeta&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;beta" title="&#92;beta" class="latex" /> is identified with <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=d%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="d&#92;gamma" title="d&#92;gamma" class="latex" /> under the identification of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Calpha&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;alpha" title="&#92;alpha" class="latex" /> with <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" />, and <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cint+%5Cphi_t%5E%2A%28-%5Cbeta+%5Cwedge+%5Calpha%29+%3D+%5Cint+%5Cgamma+%5Cwedge+d%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;int &#92;phi_t^*(-&#92;beta &#92;wedge &#92;alpha) = &#92;int &#92;gamma &#92;wedge d&#92;gamma" title="&#92;int &#92;phi_t^*(-&#92;beta &#92;wedge &#92;alpha) = &#92;int &#92;gamma &#92;wedge d&#92;gamma" class="latex" />; i.e. the absolute value of the curvature of the connection is equal to <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1%2F%5Cpi&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1/&#92;pi" title="1/&#92;pi" class="latex" /> times the area enclosed by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" />.</p>
<p>Now suppose <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> is a hyperbolic <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=n&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="n" title="n" class="latex" />-manifold, i.e. a manifold of dimension <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=n&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="n" title="n" class="latex" /> with constant curvature <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=-1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="-1" title="-1" class="latex" /> everywhere. Equivalently, think of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> as a quotient of hyperbolic space <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BH%7D%5En&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{H}^n" title="&#92;mathbb{H}^n" class="latex" /> by a discrete group of isometries. A positive harmonic function on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cmathbb%7BH%7D%5En&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;mathbb{H}^n" title="&#92;mathbb{H}^n" class="latex" /> has a logarithmic derivative which is bounded pointwise by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%28n-1%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="(n-1)" title="(n-1)" class="latex" />; identifying positive harmonic functions on hyperbolic space with distributions on the sphere at infinity, one sees that the  &#8220;worst case&#8221; is the harmonic extension of an atomic measure concentrated at a single point at infinity, since every other positive harmonic function is the weighted average of such examples. As one moves towards or away from a blob at infinity concentrated near this point, the radius of the blob expands like <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=e%5Et&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="e^t" title="e^t" class="latex" />; since the sphere at infinity has dimension <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=n-1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="n-1" title="n-1" class="latex" />, the conclusion follows. But this means that the speed of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" /> (i.e. the size of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=d%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="d&#92;gamma" title="d&#92;gamma" class="latex" />) is pointwise bounded by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%28n-1%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="(n-1)" title="(n-1)" class="latex" />, and the length of the <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cgamma&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;gamma" title="&#92;gamma" class="latex" /> circle is at most <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=2%5Cpi%28n-1%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="2&#92;pi(n-1)" title="2&#92;pi(n-1)" class="latex" />. A circle of length <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=2%5Cpi%28n-1%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="2&#92;pi(n-1)" title="2&#92;pi(n-1)" class="latex" /> can enclose a disk of area at most <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cpi+%28n-1%29%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;pi (n-1)^2" title="&#92;pi (n-1)^2" class="latex" />, so the curvature of the connection has absolute value pointwise bounded by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%28n-1%29%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="(n-1)^2" title="(n-1)^2" class="latex" />.</p>
<p>One corollary is a new proof of the Milnor-Wood inequality, which says that a foliated circle bundle <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=E&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="E" title="E" class="latex" /> over a closed oriented surface <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> of genus at least <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="2" title="2" class="latex" /> satisfies <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7Ce%28E%29%7C+%5Cle+-%5Cchi%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="|e(E)| &#92;le -&#92;chi(S)" title="|e(E)| &#92;le -&#92;chi(S)" class="latex" />, where <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=e%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="e(E)" title="e(E)" class="latex" /> is the Euler number of the bundle (a topological invariant). For, the surface <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> can be given a hyperbolic metric, and the bundle a harmonic connection whose average is an orthogonal connection with pointwise curvature of absolute value at most <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="1" title="1" class="latex" />. The Euler class of the bundle evaluated on the fundamental class of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> is the Euler number <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=e%28E%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="e(E)" title="e(E)" class="latex" />; we have</p>
<p style="padding-left:30px;"><img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%7Ce%28E%29%7C+%3D+%5Cfrac+%7B1%7D+%7B2%5Cpi%7D+%7C%5Cint_S+%5Comega%7C+%5Cle+%5Ctext%7Barea%7D%28S%29%2F2%5Cpi+%3D+-%5Cchi%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="|e(E)| = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} |&#92;int_S &#92;omega| &#92;le &#92;text{area}(S)/2&#92;pi = -&#92;chi(S)" title="|e(E)| = &#92;frac {1} {2&#92;pi} |&#92;int_S &#92;omega| &#92;le &#92;text{area}(S)/2&#92;pi = -&#92;chi(S)" class="latex" /></p>
<p>where the first equality is the Chern-Weil formula for the Euler class of a bundle in terms of the curvature of a connection, and the last equality is the Gauss-Bonnet theorem for a hyperbolic surface. Another corollary gives lower bounds on the area of an incompressible surface in a hyperbolic manifold. Suppose <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S+%5Cto+M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S &#92;to M" title="S &#92;to M" class="latex" /> is an immersion which is injective on <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cpi_1&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;pi_1" title="&#92;pi_1" class="latex" />. There is a cover <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidehat%7BM%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widehat{M}" title="&#92;widehat{M}" class="latex" /> of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> for which the immersion lifts to a homotopy equivalence, and we get an action of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cpi_1%28%5Cwidehat%7BM%7D%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;pi_1(&#92;widehat{M})" title="&#92;pi_1(&#92;widehat{M})" class="latex" /> on the circle at infinity of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" />, and hence a foliated circle bundle as above with <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=e%28E%29+%3D+-%5Cchi%28S%29&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="e(E) = -&#92;chi(S)" title="e(E) = -&#92;chi(S)" class="latex" />. Integrating as above over the image of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> in <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Cwidehat%7BM%7D&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;widehat{M}" title="&#92;widehat{M}" class="latex" />, and using the fact that the curvature of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Comega&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;omega" title="&#92;omega" class="latex" /> is pointwise bounded by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%28n-1%29%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="(n-1)^2" title="(n-1)^2" class="latex" />, we deduce that the area of <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=S&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="S" title="S" class="latex" /> is at least <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=-2%5Cpi%5Cchi%28S%29%2F%28n-1%29%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="-2&#92;pi&#92;chi(S)/(n-1)^2" title="-2&#92;pi&#92;chi(S)/(n-1)^2" class="latex" />. If <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=M&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="M" title="M" class="latex" /> is a <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=3&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="3" title="3" class="latex" />-manifold, we obtain <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%5Ctext%7Barea%7D%28S%29+%5Cge+-2%5Cpi%5Cchi%28S%29%2F4&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="&#92;text{area}(S) &#92;ge -2&#92;pi&#92;chi(S)/4" title="&#92;text{area}(S) &#92;ge -2&#92;pi&#92;chi(S)/4" class="latex" />.</p>
<p>(A somewhat more subtle argument allows one to get better bounds, e.g. replacing <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=4&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="4" title="4" class="latex" /> by <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=%28%5Cpi%2F2%29%5E2&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="(&#92;pi/2)^2" title="(&#92;pi/2)^2" class="latex" /> for <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=n%3D3&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="n=3" title="n=3" class="latex" />, and better estimates for higher <img src="https://s0.wp.com/latex.php?latex=n&#038;bg=ffffff&#038;fg=000&#038;s=0" alt="n" title="n" class="latex" />.)</p>
]]></html></oembed>