<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Larval Subjects                              .]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[larvalsubjects]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/author/larvalsubjects/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[This Gave Me a Good&nbsp;Laugh]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Over at Philosophy in a Time of Error, Gratton admirably <a href="http://philosophyinatimeoferror.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/levi-on-a-tear/">sums up</a> onticology&#8217;s and OOO&#8217;s positions on politics and ethics:</p>
<blockquote><p>First it was politics, now it’s about <a href="https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2010/06/30/more-flat-ontology-and-flat-ethics/">ethics</a>. By the seemingly operative anti-hermeneutic at work, I think this means that onticology supports killing babies if that means saving more lollipops.</p></blockquote>
<p>Or this characterization, at least, seems to be what OOO is charged with by a number of its critics.</p>
]]></html></oembed>