<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Larval Subjects                              .]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[larvalsubjects]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/author/larvalsubjects/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Object-Oriented Rhetoric]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Scott Barnett has published a <a href="http://enculturation.gmu.edu/toward-an-object-oriented-rhetoric">review</a> of Harman&#8217;s <em>Tool-Being</em> and <em>Guerrilla Metaphysics</em> over at <em>Enculturation:  A Journal of Rhetoric, Writing, and Culture</em>, arguing for the relevance of object-oriented philosophy to rhetoric.  I eagerly look forward to seeing where this all leads.  I&#8217;d be particularly interested in seeing someone giving a detailed treatment of what Latour has in mind when he speaks of nonhuman objects speaking.</p>
]]></html></oembed>