<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://lexinsight.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Lex Insight]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://lexinsight.wordpress.com/author/lexinsight/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[LORD AYYAPPA IS A CELIBATE; NOT A MISOGYNIST &#8211; A VERDICT OF&nbsp;IGNORANCE]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[Supreme Court of India, in a landmark decision allowed entry of women in Sabarimala Temple. This article discusses the broad contentions made and the basis of such a rule by the court, if it was an verdict of ignorance.
This article is written by 
Teresa Dhar of Chanakya National Law University ]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://lexinsight.files.wordpress.com/2018/12/500_f_221373817_0svoxy79wrnzcw5vh1kjae1bfjj3lv3c-e1549180399376.jpg?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[294]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>