<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[longandvariable]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://longandvariable.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Tony Yates]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://longandvariable.wordpress.com/author/anthonyyates01/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[ICYMI Paul Levine and I are organising an anti-pro-Corbynomics letter]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>In case you missed it, I&#8217;m organising, with <a href="http://www.surrey.ac.uk/economics/people/paul_levine/">Paul Levine</a> at Surrey, a letter to express the anti-Corbyn view, to counter the misleading impression given by the &#8216;letter of 41&#8217; <a href="http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/aug/22/jeremy-corbyn-economists-backing-anti-austerity-policies-corbynomics">published in the Guardian</a>.  If you are a practising economist and think you might want to sign, contact Paul or I and we will show you a draft.  We have 43 so far.   Notice that Paul already wrote a letter on the topic, pointing out how misleading the letter of 41 was on the matter of Corbyn&#8217;s anti-austerity being &#8216;mainstream&#8217;.  The letter was ignored by the Guardian, but I reproduced it in <a href="https://longandvariable.wordpress.com/2015/08/28/paul-levine-on-the-41-claiming-corbynomics-is-mainstream/">an earlier post</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>