<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[a hard and a rock place]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://muirnin.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[David]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://muirnin.wordpress.com/author/muirnin/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[011b. corrected]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Had an enligtening conversation with one of the teachers today about some of my thoughts on He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named&#8217;s stance on same-sex marriage, and he made some very good points.</p>
<p>To legalise same-sex marriage is to open up a legal can of worms. It&#8217;s not a matter of everyone just getting along. If you legalise it, it becomes discrimination <em>under law</em> for churches (who are government-protected, tax-exempt entities) to not perform same-sex marriages. The same goes for any business, non-profit organisation, clinic or hospital for whom doing so would violate their beliefs.</p>
<p>It then becomes a matter of reverse discrimination, where the agenda of the minority becomes forced on everyone. So while I personally do not wish to be the agent of social change in America or force my will on the populace, to desire the legalisation of same-sex marriage would be a disaster, and I see that now.</p>
<p>However, if and when I marry, civil union or not, I <em>will </em>call him my husband.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s really all I want.</p>
]]></html></oembed>