<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[a hard and a rock place]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://muirnin.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[David]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://muirnin.wordpress.com/author/muirnin/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[52. the locus of language in&nbsp;sexuality]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div id="post_content_9991078978378240061">
<p>I was just asked about this tonight, and thought I&#8217;d write a quick post about it:</p>
<p>&#8220;Are you a top or a bottom?&#8221;</p>
<p>This is probably the most frequent question that comes up amongst gay men when entering into a sexual relationship. It helps to define sexual roles and lay out expectations about who will be, for lack of a better word, fucking who; who will be &#8220;dominant&#8221; and &#8220;submissive.&#8221;</p>
<p>For me though, this type of language and labelling isn&#8217;t very helpful, and is more indicative of the hetero-proxy sexuality that has permeated the gay community since it came into the mainstream back in the 1960s. Without going into a lengthy discussion of Eva Sedgwick or Judith Butler, I posit that this sort of boxing of gay sexuality into &#8220;top&#8221; and &#8220;bottom&#8221; is a mere co-opting of existing and established heterosexual roles rather than the fostering of a true and authentic expression of the Mars/Mars interaction that takes place between men in a sexual relationship. It assumes that one partner will play the part of the &#8220;man,&#8221; and the other, by extension, the part of the &#8220;woman&#8221;, which by inference presumes that &#8220;gay sex&#8221; = &#8220;anal sex&#8221;, when there are far more expressions of eros than the few we make do with. Many gay men have no interest in that at all.</p>
<p>Furthermore, such language limits and suppresses exploration between partners, and locks them into predefined roles such as &#8220;dominant&#8221; or &#8220;submissive,&#8221; bolstering the idea that a &#8220;bottom&#8221; is naturally the passive partner in the relationship, and that such a pairing is one of domination and  subjugation rather than an egalitarian one built on mutual love and respect.</p>
<p>This is not to say that we can&#8217;t or shouldn&#8217;t have preferences for one thing or another, sexually speaking. There are some guys who truly enjoy being &#8220;tops&#8221; or &#8220;bottoms.&#8221; What I&#8217;m saying is that we shouldn&#8217;t allow ourselves to be defined and labelled by those preferences, just as I personally don&#8217;t think that I should automatically be labelled &#8220;gay&#8221; for having a preference for men, and more than mixed gender persons should be labelled &#8220;straight.&#8221;</p>
<p>Language like this has only served to divide us and promote stereotypes and misunderstanding. As Martin Luther King, Jr said, &#8220;Men often hate each other because they fear each other; they fear each other because they don&#8217;t know each other; they don&#8217;t know each other because they can not communicate; they can not communicate because they are separated.&#8221;</p>
</div>
]]></html></oembed>