<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Replicability-Index]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://replicationindex.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Dr. R]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://replicationindex.wordpress.com/author/rindex4science/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Bayesian Statistics in Small Samples: Replacing Prejudice against the Null-Hypothesis with Prejudice in Favor of the&nbsp;Null-Hypothesis]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<div class="wpcom-reblog-snapshot"><div class="reblogger-note"><div class='reblogger-note-content'><blockquote><p>when Uri and Uli agree, it must be true.  🙂<br />
concern about correct interpretation of Bayesian statistics</p>
</blockquote></div></div><div class="reblog-post"><p class="reblog-from"><img alt='' src='https://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c9995df3720083ccec998a9b10b363d6?s=32&#038;d=identicon&#038;r=G' class='avatar avatar-32' height='32' width='32' /><a href="https://replicationindex.wordpress.com/2015/02/02/bayesian-statistics-in-small-samples-replacing-prejudice-against-the-null-hypothesis-with-prejudice-in-favor-of-the-null-hypothesis">Replicability-Index</a></p><div class="reblogged-content">
<p><a href="http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xge/144/1/e1/">Matzke, Nieuwenhuis, van Rijn, Slagter, van der Molen, and Wagenmakers (2015)</a> published the results of a preregistered adversarial collaboration. This article has been considered a <a href="http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/neuroskeptic/2015/01/28/team-rivals-science-adversarial-collaboration/#.VMoSwC7Zb-2">model of conflict resolution among scientists</a>.</p>

<p>The study examined the effect of eye-movements on memory. Drs. Nieuwenhuis and Slagter assume that horizontal eye-movements improve memory. Drs. Matzke, van Rijn, and Wagenmakers did not believe that horizontal-eye movements improve memory. That is, they assumed the null-hypothesis to be true. Van der Molen acted as a referee to resolve conflict about procedural questions (e.g., should some participants be excluded from analysis?).</p>

<p>The study was a between-subject design with three conditions: horizontal eye movements, vertical eye movements, and no eye movement.</p>

<p>The researchers collected data from 81 participants and agreed to exclude 2 participants, leaving 79 participants for analysis. As a result there were 27 or 26 participants per condition.</p>

<p>The hypothesis that horizontal eye-movements improve performance…</p>
</div><p class="reblog-source"><a href="https://replicationindex.wordpress.com/2015/02/02/bayesian-statistics-in-small-samples-replacing-prejudice-against-the-null-hypothesis-with-prejudice-in-favor-of-the-null-hypothesis">View original post</a> <span class="more-words">766 more words</span></p></div></div>]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://replicationindex.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/adversialcollaboration.png?fit=440%2C330]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[330]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>