<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[richard2496]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[https://richard2496.wordpress.com]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[rkochers]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://richard2496.wordpress.com/author/rkochers/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Private Label Opportunities]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<header>
<div>
<div>
<h1>The $3 Toothpaste Club? Startup to Test the Power of Brands</h1>
<h2>As retailers struggle, startup Brandless hopes generic products and simple pricing will give it an edge</h2>
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div></div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a href="https://archive.is/RfoMQ/f5795a99f17a3a60377768fdefc544194f8d8818.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img title="Brandless taste-tests products in its product-development space in Minneapolis." src="https://archive.is/RfoMQ/f5795a99f17a3a60377768fdefc544194f8d8818.jpg" alt="Brandless taste-tests products in its product-development space in Minneapolis." /></a></div>
<div>Brandless taste-tests products in its product-development space in Minneapolis.PHOTO: ACKERMAN + GRUBER FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>By</p>
<div>Sharon Terlep</div>
</div>
<p>July 11, 2017 6:00 a.m. ET</p>
<div><a href="https://archive.is/o/RfoMQ/https://www.wsj.com/articles/the-3-toothpaste-club-startup-to-test-the-power-of-brands-1499767201%23livefyre-toggle-SB11030151637803663320304583254441397856524">8 COMMENTS</a></div>
</div>
<div></div>
<div>A new online retailer is betting it can get American shoppers to break up with big brands from Colgate to Heinz.</div>
<div>Called Brandless, the San Francisco-based startup on Tuesday plans to start selling generic, health- and environmentally conscious consumer staples, such as fluoride-free toothpaste and organic agave nectar. Everything will be priced at $3.</div>
<div>The business model: Cut out supermarkets and traditional marketing, funneling that money instead toward making products that can compete with pricier, name-brand counterparts.</div>
<div>In doing so, Brandless aims to capitalize on <a href="https://archive.is/o/RfoMQ/https://www.wsj.com/articles/big-name-food-brands-lose-battle-of-the-grocery-aisle-1493596823">a packaged-goods sector in upheaval</a>, one that faces increasing competition among both high-end and discount brands as well as consumers who are doing more shopping online and demanding less-processed foods.</div>
<div>“It’s an inefficient process,” Brandless co-founder Ido Leffler said of the traditional system of packaged-goods companies selling their products through brick-and-mortar retailers. “We are re-appropriating those dollars back to the consumers.”</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a href="https://archive.is/RfoMQ/12ec85fd5de1d0f84a668d101fa7fcd38f22775c.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img src="https://archive.is/RfoMQ/12ec85fd5de1d0f84a668d101fa7fcd38f22775c.jpg" /></a></div>
<div>STEPHANIE STAMM</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>The 115 products that will be initially available are generally more expensive than their big-brand rivals. Brandless hand soap, for instance, costs 31 cents per ounce, more than Dial, which goes for about 27 cents an ounce on <a href="https://archive.is/o/RfoMQ/quotes.wsj.com/TGT">Target</a> Corp.’s website for a similarly sized bottle.</div>
<div>But compared with hand soap sold by <a href="https://archive.is/o/RfoMQ/quotes.wsj.com/WFM">Whole Foods</a> ’ private-label 365 brand, which has a similar emphasis on natural and healthy products, the Brandless option is cheaper, by about 9 cents per ounce.</div>
<div>Brandless hopes its simple, one-price-for-every-product proposition will be another draw, much like the Dollar Shave Club, which upended the men’s razor market when it introduced a subscription service costing $3, $6 or $9 a month. In a few cases, $3 buys multiple Brandless items, such as a two-pack of organic macaroni and cheese. Shipping is $9, or free for orders of $72 or more. People who pay a $35-a-year membership fee get free shipping on orders of $48 or more.</div>
<div>The trick, industry experts say, will be to convince shoppers that Brandless products are of a high enough quality that shoppers feel like they are getting a deal.</div>
<div>“They need to make sure their quality is by far the best in the market for the price they are charging,” said consumer-products consultant Thom Blischok, especially since price-conscious Americans, which comprise nearly three-fourths of the U.S. consumer market, generally aren’t willing to experiment with their household staples.</div>
<div>David Garfield, head of the consumer-products practice at consulting firm AlixPartners, said the concept could appeal to millennials who are less brand-loyal than older generations, and more inclined to shop online. Brandless is, he said, “seeing the factors and phenomena in the market in the right way.”</div>
<div>He added, however, that consumer-goods companies spend heavily on advertising and prominent shelf placement because those techniques pay off. “They are underestimating how difficult it is to thread the needle and execute,” he said.</div>
<div>
<div>
<div><a href="https://archive.is/RfoMQ/f19dec53b643f64929b33f3f3397d4e80d059990.jpg" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img title="Dressings are taste-tested at the Minneapolis site in late June." src="https://archive.is/RfoMQ/f19dec53b643f64929b33f3f3397d4e80d059990.jpg" alt="Dressings are taste-tested at the Minneapolis site in late June." /></a></div>
<div>Dressings are taste-tested at the Minneapolis site in late June. PHOTO: ACKERMAN + GRUBER FOR THE WALL STREET JOURNAL</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>Mr. Leffler, who has founded several other startups including a line of natural beauty products and another of school supplies, has been working on Brandless since 2014 with his co-founder, Tina Sharkey, former chief executive of strategic advisory firm Sherpa Foundry. She also was an investor in venture-capital firm Sherpa Capital, whose investments include Uber Technologies Inc. and Slack Technologies Inc.</div>
<div>Much of their several years developing Brandless was spent combing the industry for suppliers who could provide products that are organic, gluten-free, free of genetically modified organisms or have other health-conscious credentials. Orders placed on brandless.com will be shipped from three distribution centers, two in California and one in Indiana, with most delivered to shoppers within two days.</div>
<div>The company plans to focus its marketing on social media and free samples, rather than costlier avenues like television and print advertising, Ms. Sharkey said. “We’re not anti-brand, we’re reimagining what it means to be a brand.”</div>
<div>As an online operation, the company won’t have the overhead pressures that have forced traditional retailers like <a href="https://archive.is/o/RfoMQ/quotes.wsj.com/WMT">Wal-Mart Stores</a>Inc. and Target to push their biggest suppliers to cut prices. Brandless plans to double its lineup of merchandise by mid-September and eventually expand the price range. The company said it has received $50 million in funding from investors including New Enterprise Associates and Google Ventures.</div>
<div>Mr. Leffler said the company doesn’t necessarily expect to replace Amazon or the grocery store.</div>
<div>“The average consumer shops in multiple locations,” he said. “For some people, we’ll be their everyday destination, and for some people we will be their No. 5.”</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
]]></html><thumbnail_url><![CDATA[https://i2.wp.com/archive.is/RfoMQ/f5795a99f17a3a60377768fdefc544194f8d8818.jpg?fit=440%2C330&ssl=1]]></thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width><![CDATA[440]]></thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height><![CDATA[293]]></thumbnail_height></oembed>