<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[How are people finding blogs? It&#8217;s not blog search&nbsp;engines]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Inside Microsoft we have interesting discussions about our blogs. Today Michael Rys sent around his stats. 72.86% of his traffic (about 2500 visits today) came from search engines. 25.84% came from Web sites, including other blogs, .89% came from email. .41% came from news groups. Of the traffic that came from search engines, 94.56% came from Google. 2.49% came from Yahoo. 1.83% came from MSN Search. Does Google have a monopoly in search? I&#8217;ll let you answer that question, cause I&#8217;m not a lawyer.</p>
<p>Oh, and he also has a blog on <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.msdn.com</a> but that one gets far less of its traffic from search engines, which tells him that not all blog URLs are being rated the same.</p>
<p>Also, blog search engines like Technorati aren&#8217;t bringing him any noticeable traffic. That matches what I&#8217;m seeing in my referer logs too. I wonder if Google&#8217;s blog search is going to change that much. I doubt it. Time-based search isn&#8217;t as easy to use as link-based-relevancy-search like what Google&#8217;s main engine gives us.</p>
]]></html></oembed>