<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The New VC&nbsp;Handbook]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Rick Segal just posted his version of <a href="http://ricksegal.typepad.com/pmv/2005/11/the_new_vc_hand.html">the New VC Handbook</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be honest. If I were starting a company I would try to do it without much VC, if any. Why? Cause I know some folks who&#8217;ve worked for VC-run startups. Ones where the investors made billions. Where the founders got maybe a hundred million. And where everyone else got literally bubkiss.</p>
<p>I hear these stories all the time. How the investors just don&#8217;t care about the developer. The folks who actually make the product work and make it pretty. Er useful.</p>
<p>Is there a new kind of VC that looks for a win-win-win? I&#8217;m not sure. But if there is one out there, I think that&#8217;s a selling point. Word does get around. Same for big companies. Are we looking out for everyone&#8217;s interest or just our own? Word does get around, you know.</p>
]]></html></oembed>