<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Where the heck is&nbsp;Scoble?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.vistaofficewatch.com/2006/03/24/winer-doubts-60-percent-story/">The Vista Office blog asks &#8220;what is going on here?&#8221;</a> I was traveling from Las Vegas yesterday. I was just burned out and tired. So I took a day off from looking at my computer.</p>
<p>Whenever you see a story that says 60% of any OS is gonna be rewritten you should demand that the journalist who wrote that be immediately and publicly fired. Totally 100% incompetent. Did NOT do their homework.</p>
<p>There is NO WAY a major OS can be rewritten without breaking everything and certainly not in a short time frame. Such a rewrite would take a decade to make work right and I doubt it would even after that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry I took off a day, but I&#8217;m glad to see that some people, like Dave Winer, understand just how ridiculous this headline is.</p>
<p>By the way, this kind of story is why I put my cell phone on my blog (it&#8217;s always on the right side of my blog). You are free to call it when you see this kind of news story and get me off of a blog vacation and wake me up.</p>
<p>On the other hand, <a href="http://www.windowsitpro.com/articles/index.cfm?articleid=49771&amp;feed=ArticleLink">Paul Thurrott calls me the &#8220;kiss of death.&#8221;</a> Well, gee, Paul, isn&#8217;t that nice! Heheh. How come my &#8220;kiss&#8221; never works when I say nice things about our competitors?</p>
<p>Update: Bob, in my comments on this post, asked why Microsoft hasn&#8217;t asked for a retraction. Let&#8217;s be very clear. We ARE asking for a retraction. But the damage is already done by this story. The retraction won&#8217;t be seen by nearly as many people as will see this story. That&#8217;s why I think we need to go further.</p>
<p>A journalist and an editor needs to be fired.</p>
<p>In fact, two journalists and editors need to be fired since <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=30516">the story is now being rewritten without any brains being engaged</a>.</p>
]]></html></oembed>