<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Ultra Mobile PC&#8217;s panned by New York&nbsp;Times]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>David Pogue says that the Ultra Mobile PCs that <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/04/technology/04pogue.html?pagewanted=1&amp;_r=1">are starting to ship</a> answers the who, what, when, where, but left out the &quot;why.&quot;</p>
<p>I must apologize. I&#039;m very bullish about UMPCs, but there&#039;s something more flawed than what David hints at: the price.</p>
<p>I assumed that OEMs would be able to get the price down closer to $500 than $1,000. At $1,000 you can buy a high-powered laptop. These things just won&#039;t do well until they drop in price.</p>
<p>If they were cheaper, I could answer the &quot;why&quot; for David. But they aren&#039;t. Until they are, we&#039;re doomed to a niche market, no matter how useful or cool they are.</p>
<p>Pricing +is+ important here. It&#039;s embarrassing that we haven&#039;t been able to get the price down to a noticeable gap between low-end laptops.</p>
<p>When the pricing comes down I&#039;ll get excited again. I still will probably buy one at $1,000, because I can see enough geeky uses for it (coffee table picture frame, remote control, GPS device and media player for car, etc) but I&#039;m a geek. The fact that I get excited by something doesn&#039;t mean the normal person on the street will get excited by it too.</p>
]]></html></oembed>