<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Is an anti-trust lawsuit on Eric&#8217;s&nbsp;list?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002733.php">Eric Schmidt, Google&#8217;s CEO, says to call him an idiot</a>.</p>
<p>No, sorry, I&#8217;m the idiot here and Eric isn&#8217;t an idiot. At least not when I&#8217;ve met him.</p>
<p>But, <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002733.php">he says</a> that Google hits every conceiveable problem, but faster. Well, let&#8217;s see, how long did it take IBM to hit anti-trust problems? It was founded in 1888 and if I remember right its first problems were in the mid-60s (so around 70 years). Microsoft was founded in 1975 and had its first anti-trust problems in the 1990s (so around 20 years). So, that must mean that Eric is preparing for an anti-trust lawsuit already, no?</p>
<p>Update: that link above came from John Battelle&#8217;s blog. <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/002725.php">Battelle also has an interesting interview with Vint Cerf</a>, Google&#8217;s &#8220;old fart.&#8221; (That&#8217;s what Vint told me to call him when I spoke at Google last year, but he&#8217;s really Google&#8217;s evangelist, and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vint_Cerf">inventor of a few minor little Internet protocols</a>).</p>
]]></html></oembed>