<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[100 people do most of the&nbsp;Digging]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, so <a href="http://www.seomoz.org/blogdetail.php?ID=1228">100 people do about 56% of all the Digging</a>. This is just like life. Some people do a LOT more than other people. I remember meeting Eric Horvitz at Microsoft Research. He has the most patents at Microsoft. The #2 guy? Has about half as many.</p>
<p>So, why do people get into a tizzy <a href="http://www.calacanis.com/2006/07/19/wow-what-a-response-or-why-people-get-upset-when-you-offer/">when someone tries to hire those 100 people away</a>? Cause they aren&#8217;t getting paid the value that they are creating for Digg. That is the definition of business value. Sell something for more than it costs. Profits.</p>
<p>If Jason Calacanis could actually hire away all of the top Digg&#8217;ers, that&#8217;d cost him $1.2 million. But, look at the value that would be created by doing that! Digg is already valued at many times that amount.</p>
<p>The problem is that hiring those people isn&#8217;t good enough to recreate Digg. If you take away those 100 people another 100 would jump into their spots. Why? Cause our relationship is with Digg, not with those people.</p>
<p>But, what if there was a community site where the community&#8217;s members shared in the profits?</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to be a part of something like that.</p>
]]></html></oembed>