<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Ray Ozzie &#8220;optimized&#8221; (I just want a new office&nbsp;chair)]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Jim Posner just asked me in email &#8220;any thoughts?&#8221; about <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/OzzieFAM2006.mspx">Ray Ozzie&#8217;s speech recently at Microsoft&#8217;s annual financial analysts meeting</a>.</p>
<p>You might have missed it, but about halfway down the speech Ray started talking about &#8220;optimization.&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s code for &#8220;all your attention data are belong to us.&#8221;</p>
<p>OK, OK, call off the black helicopters. This is the new &#8220;fuzzy bear&#8221; Microsoft. And, anyway, they are just copying Google.</p>
<p>You think that <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/msft/speech/FY06/OzzieFAM2006.mspx">Google&#8217;s datacenters</a> are just holding search indexes?</p>
<p>No, now Google is holding Scoble&#8217;s corporate email too! And, those servers know which emails I delete, which ones I forward, which ones I click on. It even &#8220;optimizes&#8221; those emails by pulling out spam. How nice.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m getting off track. I went through and read <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Stewart/?p=70">Ryan Stewart&#8217;s thoughts</a> on Microsoft. That brought me to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/web2explorer/?p=248">Richard MacManus&#8217; thoughts</a>. Which brought me to <a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/Gardner/index.php?p=2327">Dana Gardner&#8217;s thoughts</a>. Hey, ZDNet has some great bloggers, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>But Dana brought me to <a href="http://www.microsoftmonitor.com/archives/016742.html">Joe Wilcox&#8217;s thoughts</a>. The experience hub.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s all very interesting, but I think we&#8217;re all looking in the wrong direction.</p>
<p>It all starts with the blog. Now, why can&#8217;t I put my blog on <a href="http://local.live.com/">the map</a>? When you go to <a href="http://www.live.com/?q=scoble&amp;FORM=LVCP&amp;scope=web">Live.com and search on &#8220;Scoble&#8221;</a> why can&#8217;t I customize my results there with more information for you?</p>
<p>When I search on &#8220;Office Furniture&#8221; why is the first thing I see stores? I don&#8217;t wanna see freaking corporate info. I wanna know what HUMANS like to use in their offices.</p>
<p>None of the big search companies have figured out that it&#8217;s the humans who &#8220;optimize&#8221; the Web.</p>
<p>They just wanna collect the big company paychecks.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hearing that too here at Podtech. It&#8217;s all bunk. If there is no audience, there is no advertising. I&#8217;m not an &#8220;eyeball&#8221; to be tracked, or optimized.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be looking for who lets me get to the other humans the fastest.</p>
<p>Here, let&#8217;s try this. If I can spend less than $500 for an office chair, which one is best?</p>
<p>Optimize that!</p>
<p>Get me the humans and you&#8217;ll add $2 billion in value. And, yes, Ray, I believe you know how to do it. You&#8217;re still the only Microsoft executive to show up at a grass-roots event in Silicon Valley.</p>
<p>Remember Active Desktop and Channels? Microsoft could have OWNED the blog world and RSS. Why did that fail? Cause when we looked at it all we saw were big companies.</p>
<p>If you optimize for them you&#8217;ll fail.</p>
<p>My attention data +is+ valuable. But if you forget about the little people we&#8217;ll remember and we&#8217;ll go with systems that put us on stage. Why was Channel 9 magical? Not cause of the shaky video camera work I did. It was cause it was the first corporate site that put CUSTOMERS ON THE HOME PAGE!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m missing the humans when I visit Live.com. Actually the new Spaces thing got us to pay attention to Live.com again. Take heed off of that.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.attentiontrust.org/">Give +us+ control of our &#8220;optimizations&#8221;</a> (er, attention data) and we&#8217;ll be on your side. Behave like Microsoft of old and we&#8217;ll just stick with Google.</p>
]]></html></oembed>