<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Google not serious about Web&nbsp;spam?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.arachna.com/roller/page/spidaman/20060425#the_google_web_spam_ecosystem">Ian Kallen writes about webspam in the Google ecosystem</a>. This is one area that Windows Live Spaces got right. Until Microsoft has an effective spam blocking system it&#8217;ll stick with requiring commenters to register.</p>
<p>On the other hand, why doesn&#8217;t Google get more aggressive about blocking spammers? Because to do so would require either shelling out some serious cash to acquire Akismet or another spam blocking system or it would require making things a LOT tougher for its users. Translation: that would retard adoption, something that an advertising-distribution network like what Google really is will have a VERY hard time doing.</p>
<p>I need to go back to my little blog counting experiment that flamed out last weekend. When I was looking through the various blog systems I found that while most Live Spaces have no content, Google&#8217;s Blogger has a ton of spammers. Not sure which one is better, to tell the truth. </p>
<p>Thanks to <a href="http://doc.weblogs.com">Doc Searls</a> for linking me here.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Matt Cutts, of Google, points out this article is old (April, 2006) and that Blogger has a new system that&#8217;s a lot better at cutting down spam. Might be true, but I saw a ton that still was getting through the system last week.</p>
]]></html></oembed>