<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Yahoo reorgs]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, I see Yahoo has reorged while I flew home. <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/061205/p98#a061205p98">It&#8217;s all over TechMeme</a>. My analysis? Yahoo&#8217;s struggling to figure out how to monetize its users. I feel for them. Google disrupted Yahoo by going with text-ads and turning down the billions in banner advertising that was out there. Yahoo, like Microsoft, is struggling to deal with that disruption.</p>
<p>Trick is, I&#8217;m willing to click on blue-underlined content. Steve Broback noted this way back in 2000 when I still worked at Fawcette. The world hasn&#8217;t changed since then. I filter banner ads out. I don&#8217;t even see them. I certainly don&#8217;t take action based on them. Little blue underlined text? Much better cause it gets you to click. To take action. And they are easier to put next to content that makes sense.</p>
<p>Yahoo has two things going for it. 1) Audience. I watch how people use computers and they still go to Yahoo. A lot. 2) Brand. They have new hot brands like Flickr and Del.icio.us along with big old brands like Yahoo itself.</p>
<p>I wonder, though, if it&#8217;s too late to give up banners and go text-ads ala Google style? It probably is for Yahoo. And the hottest advertising market in 2007 are going to be in video and mapping. Both places that Yahoo isn&#8217;t really known for.</p>
<p>Translation: they might be reorging the chairs on the deck, but fundamentally Yahoo isn&#8217;t making the kinds of Google-stopping moves it needs to make.</p>
]]></html></oembed>