<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[A bug with&nbsp;TechMeme&#8230;]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something that&#8217;s bugging me about TechMeme today. <a href="http://www.viadigitalis.org/index.php/?p=185">Philippe Mottaz has a report</a> that Wikipedia is running out of cash. <a href="http://www.roughtype.com/archives/2007/02/wikipedias_cash.php">Nick Carr linked to it</a>. <a href="http://seoblackhat.com/2007/02/08/wikipedia-next-on-the-auction-block/">SEO Blackhat linked to</a> Nick and Philippe&#8217;s report. Duncan Riley linked to SEO Blackhat&#8217;s report.</p>
<p>So, why is <a href="http://www.techmeme.com/070210/p3#a070210p3">Duncan&#8217;s report the #2 thing on TechMeme right now</a> and why isn&#8217;t Philippe&#8217;s report (he was the only one of the group above to do actual real reporting from the LIFT speech this week) on TechMeme? To me, that&#8217;s a bug.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Gabe says that Philippe&#8217;s post was linked to yesterday. Look at the comments below. But why wasn&#8217;t <a href="http://www.lunchoverip.com/2007/02/lift07_wikimedi.html">Bruno&#8217;s post linked to</a> either time? His stuff is better than anything else I&#8217;ve seen and was original reporting on what happened at LIFT (he was on the floor). So was Stephanie. <a href="http://climbtothestars.org/archives/2007/02/08/some-notes-of-florence-devouards-lift-talk-wikipedia/">Her report</a> isn&#8217;t linked to either.</p>
]]></html></oembed>