<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[The bloggers get it wrong, Wired&nbsp;says]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/02/fear_and_loathi.html">Wired Magazine&#8217;s Ryan Singel and Kevin Poulsen says</a> that the bloggers got it wrong about Ted Stevens &#8220;protecting children&#8221; bill. The Wired post ends:<em> &#8220;<span class="mood">Also the blog world famously claims it&#8217;s self-correcting.  27B anxiously awaits proof.&#8221;</span></em></p>
<p>Wikipedia isn&#8217;t commercial? Yeah, right.</p>
<p>By the way, Ryan and Kevin&#8217;s blog post doesn&#8217;t have a link to the bill&#8217;s text that works. Anyone have a link that works? Post it in my comments. Thanks!</p>
<p>UPDATE: WebProNews has a similar point in &#8220;<a href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/02/15/dopa-jr-is-not-a-wikipedia-ban">DOPA Jr. Is Not A Wikipedia Ban</a>&#8221; which includes more details on what the bill actually does.</p>
]]></html></oembed>