<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Comparison of Yahoo Pipes to Microsoft&#8217;s PopFly]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen many comparisons yet of the new Mashup Editors so Jay Neely&#8217;s stuck out when he told me about it today. <a href="http://socialstrategist.com/2007/06/02/more-signal-less-noise-the-power-of-rss-mashups">He compares Yahoo Pipes to Microsoft&#8217;s PopFly</a> and also does an early analysis of Google&#8217;s Mashup Editor.</p>
<p>How about you? Have you tried any of the new RSS Mashup Editors? What do you think of them?</p>
<p>On Thursday I was talking with Mark Lucovsky at Google and he was explaining why Google&#8217;s Mashup Editor doesn&#8217;t yet have the flashy UI that PopFly has. He reminded me of my experience with FrontPage and how that frustrated me everytime I hit a limitation of its editor. I&#8217;d drop into HTML, try to change things, and then the code would change or I&#8217;d be frustrated because it wouldn&#8217;t let me do what I wanted. Lucovsky says that&#8217;s why the Google Mashup Editor team hasn&#8217;t done a flashy UI yet. It&#8217;s the philosophy of the Google teams: to make sure you&#8217;ll always be able to do what you want to do and then put the purty UI onto it later to make it easier to use.</p>
<p>Sounds interesting, but wonder what the real devs who are playing with these tools are thinking? Of course I can already hear what Lucovsky is thinking: what are the new devs who are 14 to 20 thinking?</p>
]]></html></oembed>