<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Ed Bott is pissed off at A list bloggers who don&#8217;t get it&nbsp;right]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>I started Google Reader to see what the bloggers are yakking about and Ed Bott was the first poster I saw. <a href="http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=1729">He&#8217;s complaining that A-list bloggers don&#8217;t get it right</a> and don&#8217;t correct their posts. What caused him to write this? A story that&#8217;s at the top of <a href="http://www.techmeme.com">Techmeme</a> that announces that Skinkers and Microsoft announce a live, streaming content venture. But the problem with Ed&#8217;s whine is that I see three headlines on TechMeme, one from &#8220;One Microsoft Way;&#8221; another from &#8220;TechCrunch&#8221;; and another from Don Dodge who works at Microsoft. That&#8217;s it. And all three stories don&#8217;t have the problems that Ed is going on and on about. So, not sure who the &#8220;A listers&#8221; who got it wrong are. Ahh, I see, <a href="http://www.istartedsomething.com/20070707/livestation-branding/">Long Zheng wrote a post that details it</a>.</p>
<p>Interesting that I saw both of these guys&#8217; posts before I saw any of the offending ones. Maybe that&#8217;s why I like reading feeds more than I like reading TechMeme lately.</p>
<p>But it&#8217;s also why I&#8217;m at least partially off of the &#8220;break the news first&#8221; bus. That business is getting a LOT more competitive and I find I&#8217;d rather sit back and read everyone&#8217;s feeds and pick the best post out of the bunch for <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/14480565058256660224">my link blog</a>.</p>
<p>One other thing, I told an audience recently that I don&#8217;t believe anything on the blogs for the first 24-hours. So I guess I actually agree with Ed&#8217;s thesis. If it doesn&#8217;t get refuted by someone who is actually involved then it probably is true. Except over on sites like Valleywag and Fake Steve. There they don&#8217;t even try to get the facts right and are TOTALLY for entertainment value. I read those things just for a laugh and don&#8217;t try to refute every little post they make about me (which seems like every few hours lately which is funny cause Nick Douglas of Valleywag, about a month ago, wrote a post saying I was irrelevant. If I&#8217;m irrelevant and they are writing about me what does that make them? Heheh).</p>
<p>Anyway, onward. I&#8217;d rather work with mainstream press than take potshots at them. Same with bloggers. We all can do a better job.</p>
<p>UPDATE: Of course it&#8217;s not just bloggers who don&#8217;t get things right. <a href="http://blog.wired.com/business/2007/07/dow-jones-denie.html">Here&#8217;s a Dow Jones refutation</a> of a professional news outlet&#8217;s claim that Dow Jones has been acquired.</p>
<p>Translation: be skeptical! And distrust things that don&#8217;t have open comments. 🙂</p>
]]></html></oembed>