<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[TechCrunch: Linkblogs are&nbsp;evil?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>Ahh, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2007/09/11/google-may-add-comment-feature-on-shared-reader-feeds/#comments">TechCrunch gets after linkblogs</a> and warns Google not to turn on more features in Google Reader.</p>
<p>As <a href="http://www.google.com/reader/shared/14480565058256660224">publisher of the biggest linkblog</a> on the Internet, with about 300,000 items collected over the past year, you might be right to sense that I don&#8217;t agree.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;d be wrong.</p>
<p>Content producers should be able to keep their content off of such link blogs.</p>
<p>The thing is TechCrunch is way behind the times here. If you don&#8217;t want your content used on such link blogs you should look at what <a href="http://sphinn.com/">Sphinn</a> is doing: providing only partial text feeds.</p>
<p>Also, reputable link bloggers should comply with the wishes of content producers.</p>
<p>So, Mike Arrington, are you asking me to stop link blogging TechCrunch? If so, I&#8217;ll unsubscribe from your blog and stop doing it.</p>
<p>I figured that since I&#8217;ve been doing it for a year without a single complaint from any of the feeds I&#8217;ve been using that the copyright holders have agreed that linkblogging is OK with them.</p>
<p>Is that no longer the case?</p>
<p>You all know my email robertscoble@hotmail.com and phone number 425-205-1921.</p>
]]></html></oembed>