<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?><oembed><version><![CDATA[1.0]]></version><provider_name><![CDATA[Scobleizer]]></provider_name><provider_url><![CDATA[http://scobleizer.blog]]></provider_url><author_name><![CDATA[Robert Scoble]]></author_name><author_url><![CDATA[https://scobleizer.blog/author/scobleizer/]]></author_url><title><![CDATA[Facebook $100 billion?]]></title><type><![CDATA[link]]></type><html><![CDATA[<p>At the Graphing Social Patterns conference there was a guy <a href="http://www.facebook.com/topic.php?uid=2392191727&amp;topic=2793">who said that Facebook was worth $100 billion</a>. He was properly derided, in my view, by most of the people at the conference.</p>
<p>But, one of his arguments was &#8220;would you have said that Google wasn&#8217;t going to be worth $100 billion back in 1999?&#8221; Yeah, I probably would have said you were smoking good crack if you told me that back then.</p>
<p>Problem is that if you said that back then you would actually have been right.</p>
<p>Now, in eight years will Facebook be worth $100 billion?</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s go back and study the conditions that caused Google to get there.</p>
<p>1. They shipped a real ad platform that opened up a new kind of advertising: contextual advertising.<br />
2. Search turned out to be one of the best ways to concentrate people with intent to do something together. Think about it. If you search for, say, baby strollers, aren&#8217;t you being concentrated into a pool of other people who are looking for baby strollers? That&#8217;s what made Google&#8217;s ad platform so potent. Does Facebook concentrate people who have intent to do something together? Not as clearly.<br />
3. Microsoft and other major players left them alone. Ballmer admitted to the company employees in a meeting I attended that he had made a mistake by ignoring Google. His belief probably was that Google would never be a $100 million company, much less one with <a href="http://finance.google.com/finance?client=ob&amp;q=GOOG">a $194 billion market cap</a>.</p>
<p>So, will these three things happen for Facebook?</p>
<p>No. #3 definitely won&#8217;t. Already there are tons of companies jumping into Facebook&#8217;s waters.<br />
#2? We don&#8217;t yet know if that will play out. I think it might. Many other people who are far smarter than me don&#8217;t think so.<br />
#1? Yes, that one will definitely happen.</p>
<p>Translation: <a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2007/10/facebooks-15b-m.html">I agree with Henry Blodgett</a> (damn, never thought I&#8217;d say that) that Mark Zuckerberg should take any money being offered to him at a $15 billion valuation. Yeah, the planets might align for Facebook to get to a higher valuation but there are very real risks that it won&#8217;t.</p>
<p>On the other hand, Zuckerberg has turned down such advice to &#8220;sell out&#8221; before and so far he&#8217;s been right. Is he still right? I wouldn&#8217;t be making that bet.</p>
]]></html></oembed>